Listing System Pro on Nasdaq Japan (2002)
What the money forced the company to answer
Read as the rite of passage a growing company reaches at a milestone, this listing loses its meaning. What Henmi Yoshichika had chosen earlier was a management style that stayed light by refusing seven of every ten orders. Listing sat on the opposite side of that choice: in exchange for explaining results to outside shareholders indefinitely, it bought the standing ability to draw funds from the market to hire. That the second offering in 2004 was ten times the size of the IPO shows that, for this company, listing was not a single financing but the tap itself.
Yet obtaining money and being able to decide where to put it are not the same thing. After listing, sales concentrated in contract development of mobile-handset software, and every period saw customers each exceeding 10% of total sales. The question of which market to aim the newly hired engineers at was not solved by listing; if anything, having ample funds sharpened it. The answer to that question came eight years later, in the Catena merger.
Revenue and net margin, FY1997–FY2007
Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY2002 onwards — after it was taken.
Source: securities reports
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at Systena
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
Systena’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/2317/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/2317/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/2317/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/2317/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/2317/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/2317/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/2317/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/2317/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/2317/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/2317/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/2317/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/2317/workforce.json | Workforce |