A real fall in revenue, and the turn from volume to quality (2025)
What a decline in sales with a rise in profit reveals
The core of these results is not the fall in revenue itself but the fact that the trade-off between quality and volume, inherent to a brokerage paid on completion, showed up clearly in the numbers for the first time. Tighten screening and quality after an accounting scandal and the friction before a signing increases; the count slows. Even so, by shifting its weight toward higher-priced mid-cap mandates, the group posted record ordinary profit in a year of falling sales. A set of results in which the volume measure — deals closed — and the quality measure — fee per deal — move in opposite directions is a plain picture of a company still in the middle of its turn from volume to quality.
Disclosing a decline is an awkward moment for a company the market has valued on the assumption of high growth. Rather than chasing deal counts to dress up short-term revenue, the holding company under Miyake Suguru chose to stay on the quality-first line. That judgement was, for now, vindicated by the recovery that followed: double-digit growth and a record profit in the year to March 2026. In what order to reconcile the restoration of trust with growth — this decision stands as a case in which a business built on credit put the quality of its own operations ahead of the near-term number.
Revenue and net margin, FY2020–FY2026
Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY2025 onwards — after it was taken.
Source: securities reports
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at Nihon M&A Center Holdings
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
Nihon M&A Center Holdings’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/2127/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/2127/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/2127/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/2127/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/2127/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/2127/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/2127/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/2127/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/2127/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/2127/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/2127/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/2127/workforce.json | Workforce |