Hokkaido Electric Power

Company history

Financial history 1971–2025 — revenue, cost structure, balance sheet, cash flow and key ratios, year by year →

Founded
1951
Head office
Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Listed
1953
Origin
Electric Utility Reorganization Order of 1951
Revenue · FYE Mar 2025
$6.0B (¥902bn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2025
$429M (¥64bn)
Hokkaido Electric Power: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1951One of nine — and an island on its own

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY1971 · unconsolidated
Revenue$170M
Net income$12M
Net margin7%
FY1972 · unconsolidated
Revenue$211M
Net income$13M
Net margin6.2%
  1. 1951Founded under the Electric Utility Reorganization Order; lists in Sapporo
  2. 1953Lists on the TSE First Section
  3. 1962Lists in Osaka

On 1 May 1951 the occupation’s Electric Utility Reorganization Order broke Japan’s wartime power monopoly into nine regional utilities, all created on the same day. Hokkaido Electric Power took over the assets of the Sapporo branch of Nippon Hassoden and of Hokkaido Haiden, receiving a regulated monopoly over the whole of Hokkaido on the same institutional terms as Tokyo Electric or Kansai Electric.

On one term, though, it was alone. Where the eight mainland utilities were wired to their neighbours and could lend and borrow power across a shared grid, Hokkaido was separated by the Tsugaru Strait with almost no transmission link to Honshu. Until the 600 MW Hokkaido–Honshu interconnector came into service in 1979, the island was in practice a self-contained system: every swing in demand and every plant failure had to be absorbed within the company’s own generating fleet. That single condition shaped nearly every investment decision that followed.

It listed in Sapporo in August 1951, on the First Section of the Tokyo Stock Exchange in February 1953, and in Osaka in 1962. Generation began hydro-led, but Hokkaido was one of Japan’s great coalfields, and stations were built close to the Sorachi and Kushiro pits. While Tokyo and Kansai began turning towards nuclear power in the early 1960s, Hokkaido Electric met the postwar demand boom on coal and water.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1973The oil shock rewrites the plan

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY1973 · unconsolidated
Revenue$257M
Net income$14M
Net margin5.4%
FY1985 · unconsolidated
Revenue$1.9B
Net income$53M
Net margin2.8%
  1. 1973First oil-fired station opens as the oil crisis breaks
  2. 1978Nuclear site moved to coastal Tomari village
  3. 1979Construction licence for Tomari No. 1; Honshu interconnector (600 MW) starts
  4. 1980Tomatoh-Atsuma No. 1 — the pivot to coal

The company’s first oil-fired station, Tomakomai No. 1, started up in November 1973 — one month after the first oil crisis quadrupled the crude price. A planned sequel of some 6,000 MW of oil-fired capacity in the Tomato-East industrial zone was abandoned and rebuilt as a 950 MW coal project. Tomatoh-Atsuma No. 1 came online in October 1980 and was extended unit by unit; from No. 2 onward the design assumed imported coal, beginning a shift away from the domestic pits. Coal would define the company’s cost structure for the next several decades.

Coal was not purely an economic choice. As president Yotsuyanagi Takashige put it, fuel was not something the company could procure on commercial logic alone — being the anchor customer of a coal-producing region was a role assigned to it by the state and the prefecture, and one it accepted. The 1974 Niikappu pumped-storage station added the flexibility an isolated grid needs.

The third pillar took far longer. Planning for a nuclear station in Hokkaido had begun in 1968, and eleven years passed before the December 1979 construction licence for Tomari No. 1 — the obstacle was less local opposition in general than one specific element of the plan, a scheme to truck fuel and waste along a dedicated road from Iwanai port. Moving the site to coastal Tomari village in 1978 removed that road, and the fishery cooperatives that had refused shifted to conditional consent. Compensation was agreed in September 1981; main construction began in 1985.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1989Tomari, and a three-pillar fleet

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2006 · unconsolidated
Revenue$4.6B
Net income$277M
Net margin6%
FY2010 · unconsolidated
Revenue$6.3B
Net income$88M
Net margin1.4%
  1. 1989Tomari No. 1 — first Japanese reactor to start after Chernobyl
  2. 1991Tomari No. 2
  3. 2009Tomari No. 3 (912 MW); Tomatoh-Atsuma No. 4
  4. 2009First loss since founding, in the year to March 2009

Tomari No. 1 (579 MW) entered commercial operation on 22 June 1989 — the first nuclear plant in Japan to do so after the Chernobyl accident of April 1986, and it began under a petition of some 800,000 signatures against it submitted to the governor. Local consent had been won by changing the plan; prefecture-wide opinion could not be moved the same way. No. 2 followed in 1991 and No. 3 (912 MW) in December 2009, giving 2,070 MW in all and taking nuclear to roughly 40% of supply. Coal, hydro and nuclear now stood as three pillars, with oil in reserve.

Coal expanded in parallel: Tomatoh-Atsuma reached 1,650 MW with No. 4 in 2009 and generated around 40% of the company’s output, its fuel-price risk passed through to tariffs by long-term import contracts and the fuel-cost adjustment mechanism. Almost all of this capacity sat in the central Hokkaido region — efficient to operate, and geographically concentrated in a way nobody yet counted as a risk.

Earnings under rate-of-return regulation were steady but thin against shocks. Ordinary profit reached ¥57.2 billion in the year to March 2007, then fell to ¥33.0 billion, and in the year to March 2009 the post-Lehman recession and high crude prices produced the first loss in the company’s history. Hokkaido has less heavy industry than the mainland regions, so a fall in industrial demand cannot be offset by households — another consequence of a small, closed system. Around the core utility, the group built out affiliates in telecoms (HOTnet, founded 1989, wholly owned from 2006), construction and property.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2011Shutdown, blackout, and a grid redesigned

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2011 · unconsolidated
Revenue$7.1B
Net income$150M
Net margin2.1%
FY2025 · consolidated
Revenue$6.0B
Net income$429M
Net margin7.1%
  1. 2012All three Tomari units offline; four years of ordinary losses begin
  2. 2013Tariffs raised 7.73%, then a further 15.33% in 2014
  3. 2018Earthquake trips Tomatoh-Atsuma — Japan’s first island-wide blackout
  4. 2019Ishikariwan-Shinko, the first LNG station
  5. 2020Grid business split off as Hokkaido Electric Power Network
  6. 2025“Hokuden Group Vision 2035” — $17.0B (¥2.55tn) over eleven years

After Fukushima the Tomari units went offline. No. 3 briefly restarted in August 2011 — the first commercial reactor to resume anywhere in Japan after the accident — but stopped for inspection in May 2012, and all three have been idle ever since. For a company drawing about 40% of its supply from nuclear, running replacement thermal plants flat out added fuel costs on the order of ¥100 billion a year. Ordinary losses ran four years in succession, peaking at $1.3B (¥128bn) in the year to March 2013 and totalling ¥242.5 billion; equity fell below 10% of assets. Tariffs were raised 7.73% in 2013 and a further 15.33% in 2014 without closing the gap. The restart application filed under the new safety standards has been held up for more than a decade over seismic and volcanic assessment, and as of 2025 no Tomari unit has restarted.

Then the concentration risk arrived. At 3:07 on 6 September 2018 a magnitude 6.7 earthquake struck near Tomatoh-Atsuma; three units tripped and about 40% of the island’s supply vanished at once. Eighteen minutes later all of Hokkaido — some 2.95 million households — went dark, Japan’s first system-wide blackout. Because the lost 1,650 MW station was larger than the 600 MW interconnector, no amount of mainland support could have filled the hole. The grid was restarted from hydro stations with black-start capability, reaching roughly 99% within two days and full restoration on 4 October.

The response was structural. The Ishikariwan-Shinko station, the company’s first LNG plant, began operating in February 2019, dispersing both fuel and geography. In April 2020 the transmission and distribution business was split off as Hokkaido Electric Power Network under the national unbundling requirement. And in March 2025, under president Saito Susumu — a career thermal-power engineer who had run Tomatoh-Atsuma — the company announced a plan to invest $17.0B (¥2.55tn) over the eleven years to fiscal 2035: safety works at Tomari, two more LNG units at Ishikariwan-Shinko, and over 3,000 MW of new renewables. The reason is demand. Rapidus’s advanced semiconductor fab at Chitose, due to reach volume production in 2027, alone needs roughly 600 MW — a tenth or more of the island’s consumption — and with data centres, Hokkaido demand is projected to run level with supply by the mid-2030s. A company created to keep an isolated island supplied now has to match generation to industrial siting, still without a working nuclear plant.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1974

Dropping the 6,000 MW oil plan for Tomato-East and rebuilding it on coal (1974)

A company with only one fuel to choose

For Hokkaido Electric, coal was at once a fuel re-selected on price and a fuel it was asked by the state and the prefecture to use. As president Yotsuyanagi Takashige said, fuel was not something the company could settle on its own judgement by economic rationality alone; the choice can be read as one made having accepted the role of anchor customer to a coal-producing region. Layered on top was the constraint of a thin transmission link to Honshu, which until 1979 obliged the company to balance supply and demand entirely within its own area.

The price of that role was not small. In 1979, before the switch to imported coal, with coal-fired plant at 40% of the fuel mix, the company’s results sank to last among the nine utilities, and ordinary profit fell to ¥500 million the following term. Even so, Tomatoh-Atsuma became the mainstay after the change to imported coal and drew in investment through to unit No. 4 in 2002. A fuel chosen under constraint turned into competitive strength over a quarter of a century — while the concentration on a single site rebounded, in 2018, as an island-wide blackout.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1978

Siting Hokkaido’s first nuclear plant — moving it from inland to coastal Tomari (1978)

What could be conceded, and what could not

Read the Tomari siting as the fruit of patiently persuading the locals and you lose sight of the move that actually worked. Nine years passed from the choice of a site, and what had stalled the negotiation was not a shortage of persuasion but the plan itself — a scheme to carry nuclear fuel and waste by dedicated road from Iwanai port. By moving the site to coastal Tomari village in 1978 and erasing that transport route, the fishery cooperatives that had kept opposing shifted to conditional approval. Placing the object of concession in the content of the plan rather than in the technique of negotiation can be seen as the core of this judgement.

Yet meeting the requirements and winning understanding were two different things. Even after the fishery compensation agreement of September 1981 satisfied the three conditions the state required, Hokkaido after Chernobyl saw a petition of 800,000 signatures submitted to the governor, and unit No. 1 began operating in June 1989 with that opposition still in place. Local agreement could be obtained by moving the site; prefecture-wide opinion would not move by the same means. These fifteen years show that siting a nuclear plant required two separate consents.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— Hokkaido Electric Power full history in Japanese →

  1. Hokkaido Electric Power Co., Inc. — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports).
  2. Hokkaido Electric Power Co., Inc. — Hokuden Group Management Vision 2035 (ほくでんグループ経営ビジョン2035), March 2025.
  3. Institute of Energy Economics and Society — Hokkaido electricity demand projections for semiconductor plants and data centres.
  4. Japanese full edition, with detailed sources and audit notes: the-shashi.com/tse/9509.

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer


Data API

Hokkaido Electric Power’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/9509/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/9509/history.json History overview
GET /api/9509/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/9509/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/9509/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/9509/executives.json Executives
GET /api/9509/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/9509/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/9509/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/9509/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/9509/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/9509/workforce.json Workforce