Okamura

Company history

Financial history 1966–2026 — revenue, cost structure, balance sheet, cash flow and key ratios, year by year →

Founded
1945
Head office
Yokohama, Japan
Listed
1961
Founder
Yoshihara Kenjiro
Revenue · FYE Mar 2026
$2.1B (¥329bn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2026
$141.6M (¥22bn)
Okamura: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1945A borrowed plant and pooled savings

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
  1. 1945Aircraft engineers lease the Nippi Okamura plant in Yokohama
  2. 1948Incorporated as a joint-stock company
  3. 1950Yokohama plant opens; steel office furniture production begins
  4. 1951Steel desks and chairs enter series production

In October 1945, weeks after the surrender stopped its lines, the Okamura branch plant of Nippi (Japan Aircraft) in Okamura, Isogo-ku, Yokohama was leased by a group of its own engineers. Yoshihara Kenjiro and the colleagues and subordinates who had worked under him put in their savings and severance pay, and their skills and labour, and called what they had made the “cooperative industry” of Okamura Works. Neither the plant nor the capital could be bought from outside; the only assets available were shared ones, and the district’s name became the company’s.

That founding condition was written down as principle and never dropped: employees are collaborators in the enterprise rather than hands, teamwork produces what individuals cannot, and promotion is decided on demonstrated ability without regard to age, education or length of service. The partnership was incorporated in 1946 and became a joint-stock company in 1948.

The first products were iron and aluminium household kitchenware, and steel furniture for the US occupation forces — the order book that would decide the company’s direction. Early on it also built the N-52, an attempt at the first postwar Japanese aircraft, and the Mikasa, Japan’s first automatic-transmission car; neither became a business, but both sharpened the engineering. When the American forces withdrew in the late 1950s the company redefined its market as things used “wherever people gather” — offices, shops, factories, warehouses, homes.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1960Betting on steel, and going public

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY1966 · unconsolidated
Revenue$19M
Net income$833K
Net margin4.3%
FY1984 · unconsolidated
Revenue$315M
Net income$4M
Net margin1.2%
  1. 1959US tour convinces management to concentrate on steel furniture
  2. 1960Kansai Okamura JV with Mitsubishi Corporation and Fuji Iron & Steel
  3. 1961Listed on the TSE Second Section
  4. 1970Promoted to the TSE First Section; Fuji plant at Gotemba
  5. 1972Refrigerated display cases — the store-environment business begins
  6. 1974Takahata plant for wooden furniture

In 1959 the founder and his executives toured the United States and found every office they visited furnished in steel. Japanese furniture was still overwhelmingly wooden, and the industry treated Okamura’s decision to concentrate on steel as heresy — but the metalworking skills came straight from the aircraft shop, the demand had already been proved on US military orders, and the American offices showed where the market was going. That bet produced the leading position in Japanese office furniture the company still holds. The same trip led to licences for supermarket display fixtures, the seed of a second business.

Scale came through partners rather than through the balance sheet. In September 1960 Okamura set up a dedicated steel office-furniture plant in Osaka as a joint venture with Mitsubishi Corporation, Fuji Iron & Steel and Daido Steel Sheet, and the resulting distribution tie with Mitsubishi became the base of the next two decades. Shares were offered publicly in April 1961 and listed on the Second Section of the Tokyo Stock Exchange that October, moving to the First Section in 1970 and to Osaka in 1971. Technical alliances with West German and American makers between 1961 and 1964 — including the US firms L.A. Darling and All-Steel — broadened the line and raised the quality standard. By 1968 the company was past $33.3M (¥12bn) in annual sales as the top steel-furniture maker.

The 1970s added the second pillar. A Fuji plant opened in Gotemba in 1970 for steel furniture, and in March 1972 a second Gotemba plant began building refrigerated display cases — the start of what is now the store-environment business. A Takahata plant in Yamagata followed in 1974 for wooden furniture, so that steel and wood ran side by side. Aircraft-era engineering also survived commercially in torque converters and fluid couplings sold into cleaning, cargo-handling and construction machinery.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1988Joint ventures abroad, acquisitions at home

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2002 · consolidated
Revenue$1.3B
Net income$9M
Net margin0.7%
FY2017 · consolidated
Revenue$2.1B
Net income$74M
Net margin3.5%
  1. 1988Siam Okamura Steel in Thailand; JT Okamura with Japan Tobacco
  2. 1991Tsukuba plant; NS Okamura with Nippon Steel
  3. 2004Wholly owned Shanghai subsidiary
  4. 2005Cedar acquired — logistics systems
  5. 2008Fuji Seiko Honsha acquired — powertrain
  6. 2013Hangzhou powertrain joint venture

Between 1988 and 1991 Okamura added capacity almost entirely through other companies’ balance sheets: Siam Okamura Steel in Thailand with Mitsubishi Corporation (1988), JT Okamura with Japan Tobacco (1988) — a privatised cigarette plant and its trained workforce converted to making desks — a logistics subsidiary (1989), a new Tsukuba plant (1991), and NS Okamura with Nippon Steel (1991). Demand was growing about 20% a year, and buying ready-made capacity was faster than building it.

The 2000s shifted the same instinct from joint ventures to acquisitions. A wholly owned Shanghai subsidiary opened in 2004, and three domestic companies were bought in five years — Cedar (2005), Fuji Seiko Honsha (2008) and Sec (2009) — which is how logistics systems and powertrain components joined office and store environments to form the four-business structure. Powertrain then followed the same route overseas, with a Hangzhou joint venture in 2013 and an Indonesian one in 2015.

Growth was steady rather than spectacular, and the portfolio proved its worth mainly as ballast. Consolidated revenue rose from about ¥158bn in the year to March 2002 to about ¥215bn to March 2008, fell to ¥161bn by March 2010 after the financial crisis, and recovered past its old peak by March 2014. From the year to March 2015 to the year to March 2018 revenue grew to $2.2B (¥242bn) while the operating margin improved from 4.0% to 5.4% — the combination of businesses finally translating into profit rather than only into size.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2018Dropping “Works”, and creating demand

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2018 · consolidated
Revenue$2.2B
Net income$98M
Net margin4.5%
FY2025 · consolidated
Revenue$2.1B
Net income$147M
Net margin7%
  1. 2018Renamed Okamura Corporation
  2. 2020Logistics and Cedar subsidiaries absorbed into the parent
  3. 2021DB&B Holdings (Singapore) acquired
  4. 2022Moves to the TSE Prime Market
  5. 2024DB&B taken to full ownership
  6. 2025Fourth consecutive record year; 80th anniversary

In April 2018 Okamura Manufacturing became simply Okamura Corporation. Removing “Works” from a name carried for seventy-three years — the word that traced back to the cooperative industry of 1945 — was a deliberate signal from president Nakamura Masayuki that the company no longer sold only manufactured goods but designed workplaces and the services around them. The reorganisation that followed pulled things back in: the logistics subsidiary and Cedar were absorbed into the parent in 2020, while Singapore’s DB&B Holdings was bought in 2021 and taken to full ownership in 2024. The listing moved to the TSE Prime Market in 2022.

Then the pandemic emptied the offices and shops the company existed to furnish. The response was to sell the change rather than wait it out: Telecube, a soundproof one-person booth for video calls and focused work, was pushed into offices, stations and public buildings, and as staff returned to hybrid patterns Okamura reframed offices and stores as places people choose to gather, sized for Activity Based Working rather than for headcount. Management named the resulting posture a “demand-creating company.”

It worked in the numbers. Consolidated revenue rose for four straight record years, from ¥261.1bn in the year to March 2022 to $2.1B (¥315bn) in the year to March 2025, with operating profit roughly half as high again over the same span and ROE at 12.3%. Ahead of its 80th anniversary in October 2025, the open questions are the ones a long-tenured chief executive leaves behind — how far a portfolio still weighted to office environments can be diversified and made more profitable, and who succeeds him.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1988

JT Okamura: turning a cigarette plant into a desk plant (1988)

The choice to borrow a factory

What makes this decision interesting is that a heavy problem — expanding production capacity — was solved not by building a plant of its own but by converting another company’s idle equipment. With demand growing 20% a year, building from scratch would have meant missing the wave. By taking on, whole, a Japan Tobacco plant left surplus by privatisation together with the workforce trained in it, Okamura saved both time and money. The unlikely pairing of a cigarette plant turned desk plant can be read as one ideal form of the cross-industry joint venture, in which each side fills what the other lacks.

But a deal that buys speed by teaming up with someone else always carries a price. Guaranteeing production volume brings stability in good times and rigidity in bad ones. Okamura went on to set up further joint ventures in Thailand and with Nippon Steel, which made sense as a way of securing capacity during growth. The question is how the partner and the employees are to be treated when the market turns — a management that borrows ready-made strength is truly tested not while demand is expanding but when it thins.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— Okamura full history in Japanese →

  1. Okamura Corporation — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports).
  2. Noda Keizai — 野田経済, 30 November 1964.
  3. Corporate Histories: A Century of Meiji『企業の歴史 : 明治百年』, chapter on Okamura Works (Keizai Shunjusha, 1968).

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer


Data API

Okamura’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/7994/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/7994/history.json History overview
GET /api/7994/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/7994/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/7994/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/7994/executives.json Executives
GET /api/7994/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/7994/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/7994/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/7994/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/7994/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/7994/workforce.json Workforce