Asics

Company history

Founded
1949
Head office
Kobe, Japan
Listed
1964
Founder
Kihachiro Onitsuka
Revenue · FYE Mar 2025
$5.4B (¥811bn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2025
$659.5M (¥99bn)
Asics: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1949A Kobe workshop bets on the sports shoe

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports & corporate yearbooks
FY1966 · unconsolidated
Revenue$3M
Net income$0K
Net margin0%
FY1976 · unconsolidated
Revenue$36M
Net income$1M
Net margin2.9%
  1. 1949Kihachiro Onitsuka founds the firm in Kobe and turns it toward sports shoes
  2. 1953Brings production in-house at the Tiger Rubber works
  3. 1956Onitsuka shoes worn at the Melbourne Olympics
  4. 1958Making and selling unified under the Onitsuka Tiger name
  5. 1964Lists in Kobe and Osaka
  6. 1974Reaches the First Sections of Tokyo and Osaka
  7. 1975First European venture (later Asics Deutschland)

In March 1949 Kihachiro Onitsuka — home from the war — set up Onitsuka Shokai in Kobe as a one-man wholesaler of rubber footwear, reincorporating it that September as Onitsuka Co. Its first work was mundane: distributing rubber shoes and bicycle tyres and tubes, partly as a designated agent for the Hyogo prefectural police. But Onitsuka held a conviction — that the raising of Japan’s postwar youth ran through sport — and by 1950 he had turned the firm into a specialist sports-shoe maker, beginning with basketball shoes. When wartime rubber controls were lifted in 1951 he moved into real manufacturing, with capital of $833 (¥300,000) and two employees.

From there he built a maker rather than a trader. Production came in-house at the Tiger Rubber works in 1953; Toyo Rayon’s designated-factory status let Asics develop nylon sports shoes from 1954; a Tokyo sales arm opened the east of the country in 1955. Quality rose fast — Onitsuka shoes were worn at the 1956 Melbourne Olympics, and in 1957 the firm won the small-business agency chief’s prize as a model enterprise. In 1957–58 it folded making and selling back together under one roof and the Onitsuka Tiger name. Nine years from a two-man shop, it was a specialist shoe company.

Scale and standing followed. Onitsuka listed on the Kobe and Osaka exchanges in 1964 and reached the First Sections of Tokyo and Osaka by 1974 — a quick climb for a postwar start-up — and by the mid-1960s it held the top share of Japan’s sports-shoe market, built on many-model, small-lot production with integrated runs for the high-volume lines. In 1975 it opened its first European venture, later Asics Deutschland, beginning the overseas build-out that would define the decades ahead.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1977Becoming Asics, building a global network

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports & corporate yearbooks
FY1977 · unconsolidated
Revenue$54M
Net income$2M
Net margin2.9%
FY2007 · consolidated
Revenue$1.7B
Net income$118M
Net margin7.1%
  1. 1977Renamed ASICS — Latin for “a sound mind in a sound body” — and merges with two rivals
  2. 1985New Kobe head office; opens the Sports Engineering Institute
  3. 1992Founder Onitsuka hands the presidency to Seiji Mihara
  4. 1994First Chinese production plant
  5. 2007Trading affiliate Asics Shoji brought into consolidation

In July 1977 the company gave up its founder’s surname for a mission. It renamed itself ASICS — an acronym of the Latin Anima Sana In Corpore Sano, a sound mind in a sound body — and in the same move merged with two rivals, GTO and Jelenk, absorbing seven sewing plants and a U.S. arm. In one stroke it swapped a brand for a creed and used the three-way merger to add scale in making and selling.

Through the 1980s Asics assembled the parts of a technical, global maker. It built a new head office on Kobe’s Port Island in 1985 and, the same year, opened a Sports Engineering Institute to put shoe development on a scientific footing — embedding, at the level of organisation, the R&D edge it wanted over rivals. Then came the subsidiaries: Australia in 1986, France in 1990, the Netherlands and Italy in 1991, Britain in 1992, a Chinese production plant in 1994, and a European holding company to knit them together.

Founder Kihachiro Onitsuka handed the presidency to Seiji Mihara in 1992, opening a run of non-family presidents — Mihara, then Takahashi, then Wada. The network kept widening into Taiwan, Korea and eastern Europe, and in 2007 Asics pulled its trading affiliate, Asics Shoji, into consolidation, adding a merchant’s reach to a maker’s. The thread of these thirty years was reach: turning a Japanese shoe champion into a company present in every major market.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2008The Oyama years: global management and an outdoor detour

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports & corporate yearbooks
FY2008 · consolidated
Revenue$2.2B
Net income$127M
Net margin5.8%
FY2015 · consolidated
Revenue$3.5B
Net income$84M
Net margin2.4%
  1. 2008Motoi Oyama becomes president
  2. 2010Buys Sweden’s Haglöfs — a move into the outdoors
  3. 2013World headquarters split from the Japanese business
  4. 2014Takes full ownership of trading arm Asics Shoji

Motoi Oyama — who had joined Asics in 1986 after a career in trading houses — became president in 2008 and pushed two things at once: a genuinely global management structure, and diversification beyond the running shoe. In 2010 Asics bought Sweden’s Haglöfs, a maker of outdoor gear, to stand a second pillar beside athletic footwear.

To let global decisions run free of the domestic business, Asics separated the two in 2013: it carved the Japanese operation into Asics Japan and a sales company that absorbed six regional distributors, leaving a clean world-headquarters function above. It had set up Asics Japan for domestic marketing in 2012, and in 2014 it took full ownership of the trading company Asics Shoji by tender offer and share exchange. The machinery of a multinational was now in place — but so was a business, outdoor, that shared little with the running core.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2016Losses, a retreat to running, and record profit

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports & corporate yearbooks
FY2016 · consolidated
Revenue$3.7B
Net income$143M
Net margin3.9%
FY2025 · consolidated
Revenue$5.4B
Net income$660M
Net margin12.2%
  1. 2016Buys the Runkeeper app maker — a push into direct-to-runner digital
  2. 2018Overseas impairments; first net loss in 15 years; Yasuhito Hirota takes over
  3. 2020A second loss, in the pandemic
  4. 2023Sells Haglöfs — out of the outdoors, back to running
  5. 2024Operating profit tops $660.1M (¥100bn) for the first time
  6. 2025Record $952.2M (¥143bn) operating profit; ASICS Foundation set up

From 2016 Asics moved to sell directly to runners, buying the U.S. maker of the Runkeeper app — later Asics Digital — and, in 2019, the race-registration business Race Roster. But the diversified structure caught up with it: in the year to December 2018, impairments on overseas subsidiaries pushed Asics to a net loss of $183.9M (¥20bn), its first in fifteen years. Yasuhito Hirota, who had come from the trading house Mitsubishi Corporation, took over as president and COO in 2018 to run the fix, and the pandemic dealt a second loss in 2020.

Hirota’s answer was to narrow the company to what it did best. He concentrated resources on running, cut cost, and in December 2023 sold Haglöfs outright, exiting the outdoors. The turnaround was steep: operating margin climbed from a 2.7% trough in 2018 to record after record, reaching an operating profit of $952.2M (¥143bn) on a 17.6% margin in the year to December 2025. Along the way Asics deepened its hold on running’s community — taking control of the marathon-events firm R-bies with Nippon TV in 2022 — while the heritage Onitsuka Tiger line, given its own product arm in 2009, matured into a high-margin fashion sneaker that widened the earnings base.

With foreign institutions holding more than half its shares and no stable core shareholder, Asics turned to returns. After buying back $330M (¥50bn) of its own stock in 2024, in February 2025 it moved to cancel 25 million shares — 3.29% of those issued — and buy back up to $133.6M (¥20bn) more, and it set up a general incorporated foundation, ASICS Foundation, to which it assigned about 0.98% of shares, dividends routed to youth and disability programmes and the voting rights left unused. Seventy-six years from a two-man Kobe workshop, Asics is building the base for its next decade around the shoe it never should have left.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1977

Swapping the founder’s name for a creed: becoming ASICS (1977)

A mission statement as a corporate identity

In 1977 the company gave up the name that had carried it to the top of its market. “Onitsuka Tiger” was a known brand and a founder’s surname; in its place came ASICS, an acronym of the Latin Anima Sana In Corpore Sano — a sound mind in a sound body. The choice looks sentimental and is not: naming the company after a creed rather than a man declared that the business was the mission, not the founder, and made the philosophy transferable to the professional managers who would run it after him. The simultaneous three-way merger with GTO and Jelenk was the practical half of the same move — scale in manufacturing and selling to match the new ambition.

What the rename bought was durability of identity through a long build-out. Over the next two decades Asics could add a Sports Engineering Institute, plants in China, and subsidiaries across Europe and beyond without losing the thread, because the thread was written into the name. The cost was subtler: a creed makes a company sure of what it is, and a company sure of what it is can be slow to notice when it has wandered outside itself — the very trap the outdoor detour of the 2010s would spring. The 1977 identity was both the anchor Asics kept returning to and the reason returning felt like coming home.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1985

Making shoe development a science: the Sports Engineering Institute (1985)

Building a technical edge into the organisation

In 1985, alongside a new Kobe head office, Asics opened a Sports Engineering Institute — a decision to treat shoe-making as an applied science rather than a craft. A rival could copy a good shoe; what was harder to copy was a standing research organisation that generated the next one, and by putting sports science on an institutional footing Asics turned a product advantage into a structural one. For a company whose founding creed was already “a sound mind in a sound body,” committing to measure and engineer athletic performance was less a pivot than a formalisation of what it believed.

The institute is the quiet reason the running franchise held up. Technical credibility with serious runners — cushioning and stability engineered rather than styled — is what let Asics hold its place in performance footwear through decades of fashion swings, and it is the asset the 2020s turnaround was ultimately built on. The same commitment carries a cost: an engineering culture can be slower to read consumer and fashion signals than a marketing-led rival, and Asics has at times looked technical to a fault. But when the company retreated to its core after the outdoor misadventure, the core it fell back on — a scientifically engineered running shoe — was one this decision had made worth returning to.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2023

Retreating from the outdoors, back to the running shoe (2023)

Undoing a diversification to recover a core

Asics’s move into the outdoors, buying Sweden’s Haglöfs in 2010, was a bid for a second pillar beside athletic footwear — the classic answer for a maker worried about leaning on one line. It did not hold. Impairments on overseas subsidiaries drove a net loss of $183.9M (¥20bn) in 2018, the pandemic added another in 2020, and the diversified group had spread its resources thin across businesses that shared little. Yasuhito Hirota, arriving from a trading house to run the recovery, read the losses as a verdict on breadth and chose to reverse it: concentrate on running, and let the rest go.

Selling Haglöfs outright in December 2023 completed the retreat and freed capital for the core, and the numbers followed — operating margin climbing from 2.7% at the 2018 trough to 17.6% by 2025, with record profit each year. The lesson is the mirror of the founding one: Asics wins by fidelity to the performance shoe and loses when it strays, so its sharpest strategic act here was subtraction, not addition. That the turnaround came from undoing an acquisition rather than making one is what marks the decision out — growth, for this company, has repeatedly meant returning to what it already was.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— Asics full history in Japanese →

  1. ASICS Corporation — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports).
  2. ASICS Corporation — earnings-briefing materials (決算説明資料), fiscal years ended December 2024 and December 2025.
  3. ASICS Corporation — fact sheet (ファクトシート), December 2024.
  4. Corporate yearbooks (会社年鑑) and Asics corporate records, for founding-era figures and the Onitsuka Tiger period.
  5. Nikkei — 日本経済新聞 (Nikkei Inc.), 15 September 2023, on the Hirota-to-Tominaga leadership change. Nikkei.

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →