GMO Payment Gateway: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)
1995Card Call Service, and four owners in nine years
Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
1995Founded in Shibuya as Card Call Service, capital $637,959 (¥60m)
2000Integran, then MTI, become parent; renamed Card Commerce Service
2004GMO acquires CCS Holding by share exchange — a fourth parent
2004Card-payment businesses of Asunaru and Payment One absorbed
2005Renamed GMO Payment Gateway
The company was founded in March 1995 in Shibuya, Tokyo, with capital of $637,959 (¥60m), under the name Card Call Service. Its business was payment agency work: standing between a merchant and the card issuer to run authorization, aggregate settlements and transmit transaction data. In Japan at the time this was an odd place to stand. Card payment meant physical stores, a dedicated terminal installed at each merchant and a direct line into CAFIS, the card-processing network run by NTT Data. Online retail was worth roughly ¥20 billion a year in 1996, and almost nobody made a living processing payments over the web.
That was precisely the reasoning. In face-to-face payment, where every merchant needed its own terminal, a latecomer had no room; on the web, the firm that accumulated connections earliest would be the one merchants connected to. The first five years were spent waiting for the market to arrive — Rakuten turned profitable in 1999, Amazon Japan opened in 2000 — and building, unglamorously, the integrations that later became the company’s main segment.
Then the ownership began to move. Integran bought the company in March 2000; MTI took it from Integran that September; the name changed to Card Commerce Service in November. In July 2004 MTI parked the shares in a holding company, CCS Holding, to tidy the capital structure ahead of a listing — and in September 2004 Global Media Online (today GMO Internet Group) acquired CCS Holding in a share exchange. Four parents in four years. Under GMO the company stopped being an asset that was passed around and became the vehicle doing the buying: it took over the card-payment businesses of Asunaru in September 2004 and Payment One that November, and in February 2005 it was renamed GMO Payment Gateway.
2013GMO Payment Service founded (deferred payment); Hong Kong, Malaysia
2013GMO Global Payment Fund launched with GMO VenturePartners
2014Thailand; first year under IFRS — revenue ¥7.2bn
The company listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange’s Mothers market in April 2005, two months after taking the GMO name, and moved to the First Section in September 2008. In May 2005 it bought Epsilon (today GMO Epsilon), giving it two brands running in parallel: GMO Payment Gateway for large and mid-sized merchants, Epsilon for small ones, with rates and integration specifications tuned to merchant size. For a payment processor the years after listing were a straight tailwind — as Rakuten, Amazon and Yahoo! Shopping grew, every net addition to the merchant base fed directly into transaction value and transaction count.
From 2010 the company began pushing outward from domestic e-commerce. It took an equity stake in C.O.C. (today GMO Financial Gate, its face-to-face payment arm), set up a social-app payment venture to serve the social-gaming boom — and sold it again in 2014 when that market’s economics failed to hold. In 2013 it founded GMO Payment Service, the foothold in deferred payment, the business that would later become its financial-services segment.
Asia followed in quick succession: Singapore in October 2012, chosen as the regional hub for its regulator access and concentration of multinational headquarters; Hong Kong and Malaysia in 2013; Taiwan and Thailand in 2014. Alongside them, in October 2013, the company and GMO VenturePartners set up the GMO Global Payment Fund — the instrument that made minority investment in payment start-ups a repeatable process rather than a series of one-offs. The pattern that formed here — a strategic minority stake first, a commercial partnership next, consolidation only if warranted — became the company’s standing template for deals. Revenue in FY2014, the first year under IFRS, was ¥7.2 billion.
2018¥17bn euro-yen convertible bonds; US subsidiary opened
2019~¥0.9bn goodwill impairment on MACROKIOSK
2020MACROKIOSK sold; GMO Financial Gate lists on TSE Mothers
In June 2015 the company signed a capital and business alliance with Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, SMBC and its own parent GMO Internet, raising roughly ¥8 billion in a third-party allotment to SMBC and GMO. In November it set up SMBC GMO PAYMENT as a joint venture to process payments for SMBC’s merchants. In September 2016 it consolidated GMO Financial Gate, adding face-to-face processing to a business that until then had been almost purely online. The effect showed up fast: FY2016 revenue of ¥12.1 billion and operating profit of ¥3.8 billion.
The same years saw the outward push turn aggressive. In August 2016 the company took 70% of MACROKIOSK, a Malaysian mobile-payment provider, for about $10.3M (¥1bn). In June 2018 it issued ¥17 billion of euro-yen convertible bonds to fund further deals, moved into medical booking and payment through GMO Epsilon, and opened subsidiaries in the United States (2018) and India (2019).
MACROKIOSK did not work. Its business plan fell short, the company wrote down about ¥0.9 billion of goodwill in FY2019, and in May 2020 it sold the entire stake — four years from entry to exit. What the case exposed was structural: messaging-based carrier billing in Malaysia was a different business, technically and by regulation, from card processing in Japan, and 70% ownership with dispatched directors was not enough to run it. The overseas policy was rewritten around what the company was actually good at — minority stakes through the Global Payment Fund, partnership before consolidation, and an exit by selling the stake rather than restructuring an operation. Meanwhile GMO Financial Gate was listed separately on Mothers in July 2020, putting the face-to-face segment on its own market.
2022Moves to TSE Prime; Aiura also becomes EVP of GMO Internet Group
2022Revenue ¥50.3bn, 32.3% operating margin
2025Enpay (now GMO Enpay) acquired — school fee collection
2025First unsecured bond, ¥20bn; revenue ¥82.49bn at 38.0% margin
The company issued ¥20 billion of convertible bonds in 2021, moved to the TSE Prime market in April 2022, and in the same month its president Aiura Kazunari — chief executive since the founding in 1995 — additionally became executive vice president of GMO Internet Group, putting the payment subsidiary’s founder inside the parent’s decision-making. FY2022 revenue was ¥50.3 billion at a 32.3% operating margin, more than four times the level of the year the SMFG alliance was signed.
By FY2025 revenue reached ¥82.49 billion with a 38.0% operating margin — roughly eleven times the ¥7.2 billion of FY2014. The shape of the business is lopsided by design: payment processing accounts for ¥61.55 billion of revenue, three quarters of the total and over 80% of segment profit, having grown about eightfold in ten years as merchant count, transaction value and transaction count moved together. Financial services — deferred and installment payment through GMO Payment Service — grew more than twenty-two-fold over the same decade, from ¥0.85 billion to ¥19.19 billion, by selling credit products into a merchant base the payment business had already assembled.
That second number is the strategy stated plainly. In a November 2024 interview Aiura said that e-commerce payment alone could not sustain the 25% annual growth the company targets, and put non-e-commerce, everyday-life services at the centre of the plan. In January 2025 it acquired Enpay (now GMO Enpay), which collects fees for schools and nursery facilities; in June GMO Financial Gate moved up to TSE Prime; in July the company issued its first unsecured straight bond, ¥20 billion, diversifying away from convertibles. Thirty years after starting as a small Shibuya venture, it stands on three foundations it did not build alone — a megabank alliance, a separately listed face-to-face payment subsidiary, and a network of overseas minority stakes.
The capital moved first, and the target was already there
The sums actually spent in this sequence were not large. The Payment One business was transferred for $2.5M (¥275m), a figure within reach even against consolidated revenue of ¥1.3 billion at the time. What mattered was the order of events. In the course of the parent company changing hands, a vehicle called CCS Holding was created; the vehicle passed to the GMO group; and waiting at the destination were payment subsidiaries of the same kind. This was less the result of searching for acquisition targets than of capital moving first and the companies to be combined being already in place.
Payment agency work is a patient business, added one merchant at a time. On top of that patience came an external increment that multiplied active merchant sites 2.4-fold in a single year. The goodwill of ¥270.2 million written off in one go in the year ended September 2005 pushed that year’s net profit down to ¥30.2 million. Twenty years later, in the year ended September 2025, the same company reported consolidated revenue of ¥82.49 billion.
What stands out in this alliance is how little stock the bank was given. Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation ended up with 3.36%, while parent GMO Internet held 51.65%. The capital relationship was kept thin while the substance of the business was moved into a separate joint venture — and in that joint venture the bank, conversely, held 80%. It was an allocation in which neither side had to hand the other the initiative, and the weight of the alliance sat not in the shares but in the merchants the joint venture would handle.
Part of the design was later rewritten. The original understanding that GMO Payment Gateway would raise its holding to 49% from the second year onward never happened; a capital restructuring in April 2021 left it with 40%, with Sumitomo Mitsui Card taking the top position at 50%. Seven years after the alliance, in the year ended September 2022, the parent company’s consolidated revenue had grown to ¥50.29 billion. What it gained by teaming up with a bank was not votes in a joint venture but a position within reach of the payment flow, face-to-face payment included.
Line up the figures and the full extent of the outlay becomes visible: about $10.3M (¥1bn) paid in 2016 for 70.0% of the voting rights; an impairment of ¥992.5 million in the year ended September 2019; a further impairment of ¥115.8 million and a ¥172.5 million loss on sale in the year ended September 2020; and the forgiveness of roughly ¥1 billion in loans and accrued interest. More money was lent and let go after the fact than was paid for the stake itself. The design was to run an EMS and carrier-billing business — different in technology and in regulation from the card processing built up in Japan — with a 70% holding and dispatched directors.
Since the exit, the company’s way of engaging overseas has changed. Rather than consolidating a local firm and managing it directly, it has leaned toward holding the relationship through investment and partnership, and selling the stake outright when necessary. Its accumulated investment in 2C2P, in Thailand and Singapore, came back as a gain on sale when the entire holding was disposed of in the year ended September 2022. The shares of Macro Kiosk Berhad — 70% of which had been bought for about ¥1,121 million in 2016 — were handed back to the three founders, Goh Chee Ken among them, with a debt waiver attached.
Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.
This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— GMO Payment Gateway full history in Japanese →
GMO Payment Gateway, Inc. — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports), FY2005–FY2025.
GMO Payment Gateway, Inc. — earnings briefing materials (決算説明会), including the FY2019 disclosure of the MACROKIOSK goodwill impairment.
GMO Payment Gateway, Inc. — timely disclosures on the 2015 SMFG/SMBC capital and business alliance, the 2016 MACROKIOSK acquisition and its 2020 disposal.
PaymentNavi — ペイメントナビ, interview with President Aiura Kazunari, 20 November 2024 (“we cannot reach 25% growth in this market alone”).
Shukan Toyo Keizai — 週刊東洋経済 (Toyo Keizai Inc.): 9 March 2019 (cashless payment feature); 9 November 2019 (e-commerce and payment feature).
This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
GMO Payment Gateway’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.