Renown

Company history

Financial history 1975–2019 — revenue, cost structure, balance sheet, cash flow and key ratios, year by year →

Founded
1902
Head office
Osaka, Japan
Listed
1963
Founder
Sasaki Yasohachi
Revenue · FYE Mar 2019
$461.4M (¥50bn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2019
-$61.5M (-¥7bn)
Renown: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1902A wholesaler that took a battlecruiser’s name

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
  1. 1902Sasaki Yasohachi opens a textile-sundries wholesaler in Osaka
  2. 1923RENOWN adopted as a product name, after HMS Renown
  3. 1947Re-founded after wartime absorption into Kosho
  4. 1956Five regional sales companies form a national network
  5. 1959Renown Chain Store plan organizes the small clothing shops
  6. 1963Listed in Tokyo and Osaka
  7. 1967Ie-Ie television commercial
  8. 1969Arnold Palmer — the umbrella mark

Renown began in 1902 as a wholesale house for textile sundries, opened in Osaka by Sasaki Yasohachi under the trade name Sasaki Eigyobu. The name it is remembered by arrived twenty years later: in 1922 the British Crown Prince came to Japan aboard the battlecruiser HMS Renown, Sasaki saw the gold letters RENOWN on the crewmen’s cap badges, and adopted the word as a product name from 1923. Almost no Japanese clothing then carried a name written in katakana, and the oddity of it worked as a marker on the shop counter.

The company briefly ceased to exist — absorbed in 1944 into the trading house Kosho — and was re-founded in 1947 around Onoe Kiyoshi and Honma Yoshio; Onoe’s father had helped Sasaki start the business, so the involvement ran across two generations. The corporate name only caught up with the product name afterwards: Renown Shoji in 1955, Renown Inc. in 1967, and in 1968 the absorption of Renown Kogyo, which put planning, production and selling inside one company. A wholesaler had rebuilt itself as a maker.

Its real strength, though, was never the product. In 1956 it laid a national network of five sales subsidiaries, and in 1959 launched the Renown Chain Store plan: cheap, sound underwear branded 暮しの肌着 shipped in its own steel display case and placed on the counter of every small-town clothing shop. Those shops, not department stores, were where ordinary Japanese bought clothes, and no other company had organized them nationally. Renown secured the selling space first and let the goods follow — and it spent nothing on cultivating designers, because, as one veteran put it, until the 1970s the designer could be anyone so long as the channel was properly built and the quality held. Shares were listed in Tokyo and Osaka in 1963. Then the colour television commercial Ie-Ie (1967) carried the name far beyond clothing, and the 1969 launch of Arnold Palmer put the umbrella mark on goods sold to every age and both sexes, through department stores and mass retailers alike. That last habit — one brand on two very different floors — would have been unthinkable to a later generation of apparel managers, but while the goods sold there was no argument inside the company against widening the shelf further.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1970Peak profits, and the finance income that hid the decline

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY1975 · unconsolidated
Revenue$429M
Net income$6M
Net margin1.5%
FY1984 · unconsolidated
Revenue$895M
Net income$24M
Net margin2.7%
  1. 1970D’urban founded; first product-planning office in Japanese apparel (1970)
  2. 1976Sales ¥161.0bn — 3.4× in five years
  3. 1980Sales ¥205.8bn, ordinary profit ¥11.6bn
  4. 1981Operating profit peaks at $48.5M (¥11bn) — never surpassed
  5. 1985Twenty-eight new brands launched at once
  6. 1988Onoe Kiyoshi dies
  7. 1989Reorganized into business units; operating profit down to ¥2.5bn

The 1970s were an almost unbroken climb. Sales went from ¥46.7bn in FY1971 to ¥161.0bn in FY1976 — 3.4 times in five years — and reached ¥205.8bn with ordinary profit of ¥11.6bn in FY1980, roughly six times the sales and twelve times the profit of a decade earlier, with the equity ratio lifted from 19% to 39%. The engine was the sales-subsidiary network: regional companies covering every local mass retailer, specialty store and clothing shop outside the department stores and the national chains. A former executive said plainly that in Renown’s most profitable years, when mass retailers and specialty stores drove Japanese clothing, the sales subsidiaries were what pulled the earnings. Brands were defined by who would buy them rather than by who designed them — D’urban, founded in 1970, was aimed at “a 35-year-old, university-educated Tokyo salaryman.”

Management style matched. Renown was known for what it called an un-Japanese management of enjoyment; chairman Honma Yoshio explained that the firm and the job were only means to an individual’s enjoyable life, and Onoe Kiyoshi cut through the idealism by saying that enjoyment, for someone who works, comes down in the end to pay. It was implemented as a pay system: on top of the usual summer and winter bonuses, a special bonus tied to each division’s own profit and loss, so that managers of the same rank might receive ¥1,000,000, ¥100,000 or ¥50,000. In FY1976 labour productivity of ¥6.9m and a labour share of 64.8% both ran ahead of the listed-company averages of ¥6.39m and 52.2%. Onoe himself stepped back in 1975 into a post he invented for the purpose — a chairmanship with no authority and no responsibility — yet remained the company’s discipline until his death in 1988.

Operating profit peaked at $48.5M (¥11bn) in FY1981 and was never beaten again. By FY1989 it had fallen to ¥2.5bn, against ¥17.4bn at Onward Kashiyama and ¥10.3bn at Sanyo Shokai in the same year. The market had moved: Japanese “DC” designer labels and imported names now sold on a designer’s sensibility, which was precisely the capability Renown had chosen not to build. It did respond — abandoning identical nationwide programmes for mass retailers in favour of store-by-store planning in 1982, launching twenty-eight new brands at once in 1985, and reorganizing into business units with combined planning, production and sales authority in 1989 — but none of it restored the profit. What did hold up the reported numbers was money: non-operating income ran near ¥10bn every year from FY1985 and reached ¥14.8bn in FY1990, keeping ordinary profit around ¥10bn while the operating business decayed. The company’s own later verdict was that being able to manufacture profit through financial engineering was exactly what deepened the wound.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1990Buying pedigree, and the man who came as a receiver

  1. 1990Acquires Aquascutum; sales peak at ¥231.8bn
  2. 1991First operating loss, ¥8.5bn; net assets peak at ¥188.4bn
  3. 1994First voluntary redundancy — 601 apply for 400 places
  4. 1998Mizuno Shiro takes full authority; loses the apparel top spot
  5. 1999Head office sold for ¥9.5bn; “management without assets”
  6. 2002Operating profit returns, twelve years on

Renown answered its creative deficit by acquisition. In April 1990 it announced the purchase of Aquascutum, the British luxury menswear house; the executive who drove it went to London alone, secured agreement on a Friday and closed the tender offer the following Monday, four days after the deal had been put to him barely a month earlier. Reported prices ranged from ¥18bn to ¥23bn. For a company that had never grown designers, buying pedigree was a defensible move — except that the Japanese production and sales licence stayed with Mitsubishi Corporation until 1994, and the twenty domestic licensees objected. Sales peaked at ¥231.8bn in FY1990. The next year Renown posted an operating loss of ¥8.5bn, its first ever, and the ¥188.4bn of net assets on that balance sheet became the company’s high-water mark. In the same year it spent some ¥42bn on a logistics centre in Narashino that a strong union kept closed on weekends and holidays — the peak selling days. Ordinary losses then ran for eight straight years to 1998.

Contemporary analysis in 1995 put the cause not in fashion but in selling. President Toyoda Keiji conceded that nothing but a decline in sales strength could explain it. A Takashimaya buyer said Renown’s salesmen had no drive; Isetan asked for Sunday cover and was told the union would object. One director judged that management had mistaken “sales strength” for “floor space captured.” Inventory swelled to about ¥19bn and stock turnover slowed from 15.59 days in FY1985 to 32.14 days in FY1993. The mechanism was in the trade custom: salesmen were measured on shipments, so at each period end they pushed goods onto the floor — sometimes writing the return slip together with the delivery note. Unsold goods came back, the retailer still needed the shelf filled, and the cycle repeated. In November 1994 Renown asked for voluntary redundancies for the first time in its history: 601 people applied for 400 places, and the quota filled more than a week early.

In December 1997, rumours that Renown could not fund a bond redemption drove the share price below par to ¥35. Department stores, banks and trading houses pressed for one man to take charge: Mizuno Shiro, who had joined the predecessor firm in 1954 but spent his career at the subsidiaries and was therefore an outsider to the parent. Made adviser in February 1998 and chairman in April, his opening words were that he had come to the company as if he were its bankruptcy receiver, and every director handed him a signed resignation. He cut the board from twenty to fourteen, demoted the president to vice-president rank, and in March opened a three-day window for voluntary retirement across roughly 3,100 permanent staff; more than 500 left in May. Brands were cut from about sixty toward forty. In the year to January 1998 sales of ¥183.3bn were passed by Onward Kashiyama’s ¥184.6bn — the first time Renown had lost the leading position in Japanese apparel. Meanwhile a vice-president seconded from Sumitomo Bank sold the balance sheet down: every bank shareholding including the main banks, the cross-holdings with department stores, and the head-office building for ¥9.5bn, with a plan to halve some ¥100bn of interest-bearing debt in a single year. He called it management without assets. It produced the first ordinary profit in ten years in the year to January 2000 — helped by ¥5.7bn of gains on securities sales. Operating profit itself did not return until FY2002, twelve years after the first operating loss.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2004Merger, foreign capital, and bankruptcy in year 118

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2005 · consolidated
Revenue$1.1B
Net income-$9M
Net margin-0.8%
FY2019 · consolidated
Revenue$461M
Net income-$61M
Net margin-13.3%
  1. 2004Share transfer creates Renown D’urban Holdings; TSE First Section
  2. 2005Kaleido Holdings invests $90.8M (¥10bn)
  3. 2008Aquascutum put up for sale; Kaleido exits at ¥2.6bn
  4. 2009Aquascutum sold; Kitabata Minoru becomes president
  5. 2010Shandong Ruyi takes ~40% for about $45.6M (¥4bn)
  6. 2019¥5.3bn provision on receivables from the parent’s subsidiary
  7. 2020Civil rehabilitation in May; delisted in June; bankruptcy in November

In October 2003 Renown and the menswear house D’urban signed a memorandum to combine; shareholder meetings approved in December, and in March 2004 a share transfer created Renown D’urban Holdings, listed on the First Section of the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Consolidated sales were ¥124.7bn in the year to February 2005. Tidying the subsidiaries produced three consecutive years of operating profit from FY2004, and roughly ¥30bn of combined accumulated losses was written off against reserves. In November 2005 the investment firm Kaleido Holdings put in $90.8M (¥10bn); in March 2006 the two operating companies were absorbed, the name reverted to Renown Inc., and the womenswear house Leilian was brought in as a subsidiary.

With three profitable years and fresh capital, Renown went on the offensive: about ¥6bn over three years from 2006 to rebuild Aquascutum’s product planning, a second attempt at the United States, the revival of Norma Kamali to cover the young-career segment it lacked, and more department-store doors. Consolidated sales recovered to ¥176.3bn in the year to February 2007, with 3,972 employees. The stamina was not there. A later president said frankly that the company had not had the strength to push out that far, and FY2007 swung back to a ¥2.1bn operating loss. In October 2008 Renown turned to cash: sell Aquascutum, kill sixteen unprofitable brands, cut 400 staff, sell the Gotanda head office and the Osaka distribution centre. President Nakamura Minoru called Aquascutum a superb brand with nearly 160 years behind it and real prospects, and said the decision to sell it was unavoidable. On 5 September that year Kaleido had already sold its stake to the Neoline group for ¥2.6bn — two years and ten months after investing ¥10bn, and ten days before Lehman Brothers failed.

The new lead shareholder pushed into management. Neoline demanded three board seats in 2009; Renown countered by removing the entire board and promoting Kitabata Minoru, the head of corporate planning, to president at 47. Aquascutum was sold that September and Leilian in January 2010, and with both brands gone consolidated sales fell from ¥129.1bn in the year to February 2010 to ¥73.3bn a year later, with employees down from 3,851 to 1,571. Almost everything saleable had been sold. In July 2010 the Chinese textile group Shandong Ruyi subscribed to a placement of about $45.6M (¥4bn) for roughly 40% — the first time a Chinese company had taken over a First Section listed firm — and a further ¥2.9bn in December 2013 lifted the group above 53%. Kitabata had chosen an operating company over the investment funds also at the table, on the reasoning that a partner who could cut costs and open Chinese channels was worth more than one who would exit in a few years. The numbers never turned: in the twenty-three years from 1992 only two closed in the black, both on gains from asset sales, for a cumulative net loss of ¥177.2bn, and sales slid from ¥72.2bn (FY2014) to ¥63.7bn (FY2018). The end came through the parent itself. In the ten-month period to December 2019 Renown could not collect receivables from a Shandong Ruyi subsidiary and booked a ¥5.3bn bad-debt provision; sales were ¥50.3bn against an operating loss of ¥8.0bn, and net assets of ¥15.3bn stood below a tenth of the 1991 peak. Shandong Ruyi, jointly liable, did not honour the guarantee. March 2020 same-store sales fell 42.5% year on year and April 81% as the pandemic emptied the department stores that supplied nearly 60% of parent sales — seven weeks after Mouri Kenji had become president on 26 March. On 15 May 2020 the Tokyo District Court opened civil rehabilitation proceedings over about ¥13.8bn of debt; the listing that began in 1963 ended in June after 57 years; no sponsor would take the whole company, D’urban and a few other brands were sold off separately, and in November the case converted to bankruptcy, in the 118th year. Reading that ending as one management team’s failure explains only part of it: Renown grew by organizing the small shops and the mass retailers, shrank as those floors shrank, and the department stores it fell back on were themselves retreating — Onward closed some 700 stores in FY2020 and Sanyo Shokai withdrew from as many as 150 unprofitable counters.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1990

Buying Aquascutum without the Japanese licence (1990)

The author’s view

A company that had never raised designers of its own buys a marque with pedigree from outside. As choices went in 1990, that was reasonable: the twenty-eight brands launched at once in 1985 had failed, so the verdict on building in-house was already in. What made it possible was that non-operating income could still manufacture an ordinary profit, and that the death of Onoe Kiyoshi in 1988 had removed the weight that held the company in check. The question is how much of the Japanese rights position could really be verified in the four days it took to close.

The pedigree it bought grew, once the licence came back, into a business of some ¥10bn — so the acquisition was not a failure. But after a further ¥6bn was poured in over the three years from 2006, the sale was decided in 2008: an asset the company had cultivated was let go to fund the parent’s own cash needs. Buying a brand presupposes the strength of the core business that carries it. When that premise fails, the better the brand has grown, the sooner it becomes the thing turned into cash. That relationship is what the nineteen-year round trip demonstrates.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1998

Handing full authority to an outsider chairman (1998)

The author’s view

“I came to this company as if I were its bankruptcy receiver.” That one line produced resignation letters from every director, which tells you how little capacity remained inside to settle anything. When the president stayed on in 1995 as a demoted vice-president rather than resigning, there was criticism about how responsibility had been taken. Three years passed in which the internal hierarchy could not decide its own people’s fate, and it ended with the company entrusted to a 68-year-old outsider. Precisely because Mizuno Shiro had spent so little of his career in the parent, he could line up board cuts and the demotion of a president without personal obligation.

What the regime fixed, though, was the accounts and the headcount, not the ability to sell. Mizuno himself invoked Onoe Kiyoshi’s teaching — that the aim was not to expand sales blindly but to become a company that reliably takes a profit — and concluded that forgetting it and running to financial engineering was what brought on the crisis. A recovery framed as remembering a teaching does not extend to recovering what was lost. That the ordinary profit of the year to January 2000 rested on gains from securities sales is the measure of that limit.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2010

The placement to Shandong Ruyi and life under a foreign parent (2010)

The author’s view

“Including the head-office building, everything saleable has already been sold.” In that condition there was very little room to choose a counterparty. Even so, Kitabata Minoru picked an operating company rather than an investment fund and attached a five-year lock-up on the shares — a partner to build Chinese selling floors with, not one to inject capital and exit in a few years. As a judgement made at the time it was coherent, and the fact that Shandong Ruyi was regarded by the Chinese government as a model enterprise plainly supported it.

The miscalculation was that the party meant to provide support became heavy itself. Shandong Ruyi spent enormous sums on acquisitions, jammed its own funding, and in 2019 could not pay ¥5.3bn owed by a subsidiary. Once a jointly liable party declines to honour its guarantee, there is nothing left for the other side to play. Buying time with someone else’s capital assumes that the seller of that time stays solvent. After this ending, one cannot say that choosing an operating company was the safer option.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— Renown full history in Japanese →

  1. Renown Inc. — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports), FY2005 to FY2019, including the corporate-history sections.
  2. Nikkei Business — 日経ビジネス (Nikkei BP): 27 Feb 1978 (case study); 9 Apr 1979 and 1 Jun 1981 (interviews with president Inagawa Hiromichi); 14 Jun 1982; 24 Sep 1990 (restructuring); 17 Jun 1991; 13 Feb 1995 (case study on the loss of selling power); 20 Apr 1998 (“Renown’s last bet”).
  3. Shukan Toyo Keizai — 週刊東洋経済 (Toyo Keizai): 26 Sep 1998; 2 Oct 1999; 1 Nov 2008; 29 May and 19 Jun 2010 (scoop and interview with president Kitabata Minoru); 30 May 2014; 6 Jun 2020; 13 Mar 2021.
  4. Nihon Keizai Shimbun — 日本経済新聞, 15 Jun 2020 (“Renown ends 57 years as a listed company”).
  5. Encyclopaedia Britannica Japan and Nipponicaブリタニカ国際大百科事典 / 日本大百科全書, entries for Renown.

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer


Data API

Renown’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/3606/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/3606/history.json History overview
GET /api/3606/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/3606/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/3606/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/3606/executives.json Executives
GET /api/3606/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/3606/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/3606/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/3606/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/3606/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/3606/workforce.json Workforce