Daito Trust Construction

Company history

Financial history 1982–2025 — revenue, cost structure, balance sheet, cash flow and key ratios, year by year →

Founded
1974
Head office
Tokyo, Japan (founded in Nagoya)
Listed
1989
Founder
Tada Katsumi
Revenue · FYE Mar 2025
$12.3B (¥1.84tn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2025
$627.5M (¥94bn)
Daito Trust Construction: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1974Warehouses on farmland

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY1982 · unconsolidated
Revenue$9M
Net income
Net margin
FY1988 · unconsolidated
Revenue$349M
Net income
Net margin
  1. 1974Tada Katsumi founds Daito Sangyo in Nagoya
  2. 1978Renamed Daito Kensetsu; expands into the Kansai region
  3. 1980Daito Kyosaikai — 90% rent guarantee for a 4% fee
  4. 1984Adds residential rental buildings to the warehouse line
  5. 1985Six group companies merge into one
  6. 1988Renamed Daito Kentaku; the master-lease model is set

In June 1974 Tada Katsumi set up Daito Sangyo in Chikusa ward, Nagoya, with capital of $3,413 (¥1m). The business was not rental housing but contracting: putting warehouses, workshops and other commercial rental buildings on land owned by other people. Its customers were farmers holding fields inside designated urbanization zones — squeezed by the lack of an heir and by farmland being taxed as if it were building land, pushed to make the ground earn, and yet unable to commit because they did not know the rental trade. Roughly 7,000 hectares of such farmland was converted every year, and Daito aimed its salesmen at exactly that flow. Sister firms followed to cover the rest of the job — Daito Kosan (1975) to find tenants, Daito Sekkei (1976) to draw the plans — and the group pushed into Osaka in 1978, Yokohama in 1982 and Sendai in 1983, merging its six companies into one in 1985.

Two habits set it apart from the housebuilders. The first was cold calling. Daito refused to work the referral networks of agricultural co-ops and banks, because a landowner who arrived that way would put several builders in competition and negotiate the price down, and the co-op would want its fee; approached cold, the same landowner bought the building at list price, and the salesman took 2% of the order as commission. It also chose ground the giants did not want — Sekisui House was strong around stations, Daiwa House along the roadsides, so Daito took the suburban fields. The second habit was to sell away the fear. In March 1980 it founded Daito Kyosaikai: for a fee of 4% of monthly rent, an owner whose unit fell empty mid-lease was paid 90% of the rent anyway. Over 90% of owners joined, and vacancy on covered buildings ran in the 1% range.

In April 1988 the company renamed itself Daito Kentaku建託, “build” plus “entrust” — and made the arrangement explicit. It now proposed the building, took the construction contract, then leased the finished block back in bulk and handled letting, rent collection, maintenance and the vacancy guarantee under one signature. A landowner with every unit full paid 4% to the mutual-aid company and 5% to Daito in management fees and kept 91% of the rent; with units empty he kept 90%. Almost nothing changed for him either way. For Daito, a one-off contracting fee turned into a thin, permanent stream of management fees and membership dues, and gross margins of about 30% — high for a construction firm. Revenue of $9M (¥2bn) in the year to March 1982, from 98 staff in seven offices, had reached ¥44.7bn by March 1988.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1989Listing, the vacancy shock, and filling in the neighbours

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY1989 · unconsolidated
Revenue$534M
Net income
Net margin
FY2002 · consolidated
Revenue$2.7B
Net income$188M
Net margin7.1%
  1. 1989Lists on the Nagoya Stock Exchange, second section
  2. 1990Head office moves from Nagoya to Tokyo
  3. 1992Lists on the TSE first section, debt-free
  4. 1993Revenue ¥277.9bn — eleven straight record years
  5. 1994Vacancy hits 5.2%; first revenue fall since founding
  6. 1996Five-year plan; brokerage, lending, gas taken in-house

Daito listed on the second section of the Nagoya exchange in March 1989, moved up to the first section in September 1991 and onto the Tokyo Stock Exchange first section in February 1992 — thirty months from one to the other. Head office followed the money to Tokyo in 1990. The business threw off cash by construction: customers paid before subcontractors did, and the company held neither land nor materials as inventory, so it carried no debt at all — short- and long-term borrowings were zero at September 1992, equity was 60% of the balance sheet, and the interest on its idle cash flowed straight into profit. Revenue reached ¥151.1bn in the year to March 1991, 96% of it construction, sold by roughly 1,100 salesmen out of 73 branches.

Then the tax code opened the market wider. The 1991 revision of the Productive Green Land Act and the land-tax package around it forced holders of urban farmland in the three big metropolitan areas to decide, and Daito’s customers surfaced en masse. Revenue jumped 34% to ¥277.9bn in the year to March 1993, an eleventh straight year of records. The mix flipped with it: apartments and condominiums went from 34% of completed work to 62% in a single year while warehouses and factories fell away, because only about a fifth of land inside urbanization zones could take an industrial building at all. The company that had begun with warehouses was now, in substance, a housebuilder.

The guarantee then showed its other face. Vacancies started climbing in spring 1993; by March 1994 the vacancy rate on covered buildings had gone from 2% to 5.2%, and Daito cut its forecast and posted the first revenue decline in its twenty years. Because it was the company, not the owner, that carried the empty units, it had to brake its own order book: the guarantee was cut from 90% to 80% in August 1994, salesman recruitment was stopped in October, the membership fee was raised from 4% to 6% in January 1995, and the sales force fell from about 1,600 to 1,100. The brakes came off through 1995, and the answer to the next cycle was to own the whole chain instead — Daito Finance (1993) for bridge loans to owners, Housecom (1994) for retail brokerage, Daito Building Management (1999), and the Gaspal companies (2001–02) for propane. Consolidated revenue was ¥332.2bn by March 2002.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2003Scale, succession, and a trillion yen

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2003 · consolidated
Revenue$3.2B
Net income$210M
Net margin6.5%
FY2017 · consolidated
Revenue$13.3B
Net income$733M
Net margin5.5%
  1. 2003Head office moves to Shinagawa, Tokyo
  2. 2006Thirty-year master leases introduced (rent fixed for ten)
  3. 2011Housecom lists separately; founder Tada leaves the board
  4. 2011Consolidated revenue passes ¥1 trillion
  5. 2015Inheritance-tax reform drives a rental-building boom
  6. 2017Three-company structure: build, manage, let

The company moved into Shinagawa East One Tower — a rental complex it had built itself — in April 2003, and for the first time began handing the presidency around: Asada Moritaka from 2003, the founder back in the chair in 2006, Mitsunabe Isao from 2007, Kumakiri Naomi from 2012. Outside directors arrived in 2005, by which point foreign and institutional investors held more than 80% of the shares. In 2006 Daito began writing thirty-year master leases, with the rent itself guaranteed for the first ten years — a detail that decided almost nothing at the time and almost everything after 2018. Operating profit of ¥72.6bn in the year to March 2007 was larger than any of Japan’s general contractors earned.

In June 2011 the subsidiary Housecom listed on JASDAQ on its own — the first time a consolidated subsidiary of the group had been floated separately — and at the same month’s shareholders’ meeting Tada Katsumi left the board, taking a ¥3bn retirement payment; the 36.78m shares held by his asset-management vehicle were bought in and cancelled. The founder was gone, the register was institutional, and consolidated revenue passed ¥1 trillion that same year.

What carried it from one trillion to one and a half was a change in the tax law rather than anything Daito did. The January 2015 inheritance-tax reform cut the basic deduction by 40%, and building a rental block on inherited land became the standard way to lower the bill; orders rose across the country. Revenue reached ¥1,497.1bn in the year to March 2017 and ordinary profit ¥124.5bn. The group tidied itself to match, splitting the work in 2017 among three principal companies — Daito Trust Construction to build, Daito Trust Partners to manage, Daito Trust Leasing to let — with the vacancy guarantee first written in 1980 now standing behind roughly 1.03 million homes.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2018The guarantee comes due

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2018 · consolidated
Revenue$14.1B
Net income$795M
Net margin5.6%
FY2025 · consolidated
Revenue$12.3B
Net income$627M
Net margin5.1%
  1. 2018Ten-year rent guarantees start coming up for review
  2. 2020Sublease Law takes effect
  3. 2023Takeuchi Kei named CEO; acquisitions beyond the master lease
  4. 2024Buys STASIA Capital Management (US asset management)
  5. 2025Housecom taken private, ending the dual listing
  6. 2025Revenue ¥1,842.4bn; record net profit

Because the rent inside a thirty-year lease was fixed only for ten, the buildings signed from 2008 onwards began coming up for review from 2018 — under Kobayashi Katsumitsu, a salesman who had joined in 1986 and become president in 2018. Owners started receiving letters: one in Suginami, Tokyo, was told three months after a tenant left that “as you will not agree to a rent reduction, we cannot guarantee the rent under the master lease.” An owner in Saitama, told nothing of how the new figure had been calculated, took the case to court-annexed mediation in May 2020 and had the rent set by an appraiser. The law was on the company’s side — under the Land and Building Lease Act it is the master lessee, the party paying the rent, that may demand a reduction, mid-contract — which was precisely the problem. In December 2020 the Sublease Law came into force, banning improper solicitation and misleading advertising and requiring the rent risk to be explained in writing.

The pressure ran downward as well as outward. A salesman who started no building in six months lost his bonus and saw his salary cut; in 2015 a former salesman in Matsumoto forged a contract to push an apartment through without the customer’s consent and was charged with attempted murder, and in 2017 the suicide of a new graduate was treated as death from overwork. Construction sales headcount fell for a second straight year, to 3,273 at the end of 2017. The engine that had aggregated the market — visit enough landowners, sell at list price — was the same mechanism now producing the complaints.

Takeuchi Kei, president since 2022, took the newly created post of CEO in April 2023 and began spending the cash somewhere other than the master lease: Invalance (investment-property sales, 2020), Rising Force (asset management, 2022), Shima (nursing care, 2023), STASIA Capital Management in the United States (2024), plus biomass energy and, in 2025, a 96% stake in Ascot. In February 2025 Housecom was bought in and delisted, ending fourteen years of parent-and-subsidiary listing and reversing the 2011 decision. Consolidated revenue reached ¥1,842.4bn in the year to March 2025 with record net profit of ¥93.9bn — about 820 times the revenue of 1982, on an operating margin of 6.5%. The open question is the one built into the model: rental stock put up in the 2015 tax boom turns ten around 2025, into a market with more empty homes every year.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1988

Renaming to “Kentaku”: the land-entrustment model (1988)

Opening a market by carrying someone else’s fear

At the centre of this decision is a move of both revenue and risk: from a company that sold buildings to a company that took on the empty rooms afterwards. Seen from the landowner’s side, the uncertainty that had been blocking the decision passed to the company, and his take became near-constant whether or not the units were let. Seen from the company’s side, a one-off contracting fee was overlaid with a thin, long-lived income in management fees and mutual-aid dues. The 1988 renaming can be read as the procedure by which that exchange was declared in public. That it took a fragmented market of local builders toward a national near-monopoly by competing on neither price nor construction method, but on the design of the contract, tells you what kind of company this is.

The risk it took on, however, did not disappear. A few points of movement in the vacancy rate is enough to flip the economics of the guarantee, and in 1994 the company had to change the guarantee ratio and the fee rate, braking its own order intake. The same tension surfaced again a quarter of a century later, as rent-reduction negotiations inside the thirty-year master leases. A model that opened a market by shouldering the landowner’s anxiety — how far it explains the terms of that shouldering, and at what point it revises them — is exactly what Daito Trust is still being asked to account for: the content of the exchange it chose for itself in 1988.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1996

Taking the trades around the lease in-house (1996)

Diversification as filling in next door

This run of subsidiary formations was not an expansion into unrelated ground but the work of filling in, one at a time, the plots adjoining the business it already had. Brokerage, lending, management, gas — every one of them is work that necessarily arises between a landowner who has built a rental block and the tenants who live in it, and each has the character of pulling back in-house an income that had been handed to outside operators. What president Tada Katsumi described with the word “totalization” can be read less as opening a new market than as recovering what had been leaking out of the market he had made himself. Being debt-free, with an investment portfolio on the order of ¥100bn, was what let him do the recovering all at once.

What was not settled at the time was what to put beyond the last adjoining plot. Heavier than the failure to hit the five-year plan’s revenue target is the fact that, so long as the company remains a builder, the surrounding income is itself bound to the number of housing starts. The investments from the 2010s onwards — overseas property, nursing care, asset management — can be read as the reverse side of that: there is little left to fill in around domestic rental housing. The 1990s question of how much of the adjacent ground to own outright reaches, in altered form, into today’s capital allocation.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2011

Listing Housecom, and taking it back fourteen years later (2011)

Opening up, and binding back together

The 2011 listing and the 2025 take-private look like opposite decisions, but they can be seen as two answers to a single question: whether to grow the brokerage function inside the group, or to grow it while letting the outside market price it. At the time it chose to list, Daito Trust had extinguished the founder’s shareholding and moved to a register dominated by foreign and institutional investors. Giving a subsidiary its own capital and its own name was of a piece with that opening up.

Over fourteen years the premises changed. The more the parent gathered property functions by acquisition and tightened a structure that binds building, managing and letting together, the harder the listed subsidiary became to explain — and the market, too, now looks less kindly on parent-and-subsidiary listings than it did. How far to make one function independent, and at what point to bind it back in: the two answers Daito Trust gave in 2011 and in 2025 appear to have followed the shareholder register and the shape of the business as each stood at the time.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— Daito Trust Construction full history in Japanese →

  1. Daito Trust Construction Co., Ltd. — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports).
  2. Securities Analysts Journal — 証券アナリストジャーナル, June 1994: “Daito Kentaku — hit by the recession, a slight fall in revenue last term” (Tada Katsumi). NDL Digital Collections.

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer


Data API

Daito Trust Construction’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/1878/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/1878/history.json History overview
GET /api/1878/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/1878/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/1878/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/1878/executives.json Executives
GET /api/1878/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/1878/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/1878/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/1878/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/1878/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/1878/workforce.json Workforce