The Sakuma dam joint venture with Guy F. Atkinson (1953)
Until a borrowed system becomes your own technology
The phrase “technical tie-up” may bring to mind an exchange of drawings and patents. What Hazama received at Sakuma, though, was a fleet of machines running from wagon drills to cable cranes, and the site organization needed to operate them. A working method assembled out of manpower, straw baskets and hand-pushed carts had to be replaced while a job worth some ¥8.5bn was already under way. That a schedule conventionally put at more than ten years came down to three owes less to the performance of the machines than to the strength of the side that made that changeover work at the first attempt.
The tie-up was not, however, Hazama’s conception. It was Takasaki Tatsunosuke, president of the client Electric Power Development Company, who travelled to the United States, compared the work at Pine Flat Dam, and arranged the $4.5m machinery import and the engineering assistance. Hazama was a bidder competing inside that framework; both the machines and the money came from outside. Whether the borrowed system became its own technology is answered by what followed — Atkinson technology brought in again at Miboro, and the type extended to Kurobe No.4 and Ikawa.
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at Hazama Ando
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
Hazama Ando’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/1719/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/1719/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/1719/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/1719/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/1719/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/1719/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/1719/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/1719/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/1719/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/1719/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/1719/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/1719/workforce.json | Workforce |