Meiko

Company history

Financial history 2002–2025 — revenue, cost structure, balance sheet, cash flow and key ratios, year by year →

Founded
1975
Head office
Ayase, Kanagawa, Japan
Listed
2000
Founder
Naya Yuichiro
Revenue · FYE Mar 2025
$1.4B (¥207bn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2025
$99.6M (¥15bn)
Meiko: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1975One component, made at home

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
  1. 1975Meiko Denshi Kogyo incorporated in Ayase, Kanagawa
  2. 1979Game boards for Space Invaders lift the business
  3. 1980Ayase head office and plant; multilayer press installed
  4. 1985Plaza Accord: customers move offshore, first loss
  5. 1991Renamed Meiko Co., Ltd.
  6. 1997Build-up board building at the Yamagata plant

Meiko began as a deliberate narrowing. Naya Yuichiro, born in December 1943 and an engineer at Showa Musen Kogyo (today SMK), had worked on circuit boards and concluded that consumer electronics would keep demanding denser wiring — and that the double-sided board, then the advanced product, was where the demand would grow. In 1974 he fitted out a shed of about ten tsubo (some 33 m²) in his own garden and began designing and making board patterns; in November 1975 he incorporated it in Ayase, Kanagawa as Meiko Denshi Kogyo (名幸電子工業), with a single stated purpose — the manufacture and sale of printed wiring boards. The logic of staying with one part was that each generation of electronics deepened the same craft: the products changed, the accumulated process did not.

Orders arrived with the arcade boom — game boards for Space Invaders in 1979 — and the company built rather than bought. A new head office and plant in Ayase in 1980 put design through finished board under one roof; that December a multilayer press took Meiko out of two-layer work and into the high-density boards it had no orders for yet. Subsidiaries followed the widening product line: Multitech in 1982 for single-sided boards (now Meiko Tech), a Yamagata joint venture the same year, a Fukushima plant in 1990. In April 1991 the name became simply Meiko.

The hard lesson came in between. After the 1985 Plaza Accord the yen’s surge pushed Meiko’s customers to manufacture abroad, orders collapsed, and the company booked the first loss of its life — Naya has called it the worst stretch of his fifty years, one in which he asked competitors as well as customers for work. It recovered on home game consoles and on an early read that automotive boards were the next use. What it had lost in 1985 was not technology but proximity: in November 1997 Meiko put up a building at Yamagata for build-up boards, the density technology that mobile phones and notebook PCs then needed — and within a year it was carrying that method offshore itself.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1998Going offshore, and going public

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2002 · consolidated
Revenue$137M
Net income
Net margin
FY2006 · consolidated
Revenue$433M
Net income$41M
Net margin9.5%
  1. 1998Hong Kong company; Guangdong (Panyu Nansha) subsidiary
  2. 2000Shares registered with the JSDA
  3. 2001Guangzhou plant starts production
  4. 2004Listed on the JASDAQ exchange
  5. 2005Wuhan subsidiary established (plant running 2006)

In August 1998 Meiko set up a Hong Kong company as its trading and procurement window, and in December established a manufacturing subsidiary in Panyu Nansha, Guangdong. The Guangzhou plant did not start production until January 2001 — a two-year build that says what kind of move this was. It was not chasing the lowest labour rate; it was the answer, thirteen years late, to 1985. If the customers’ factories had crossed the water, a board maker that stayed home was standing where the work no longer reached.

Capital followed the same sequence. Meiko registered its shares with the Japan Securities Dealers Association in December 2000, twenty-five years after founding, and listed on the JASDAQ exchange in December 2004 — a public balance sheet assembled precisely while the offshore build-out began, and one that funded what came next. The founding family kept control throughout: Naya himself has held roughly 18% of the shares, and the family and related companies together some 24–25%, so an owner-run company and a listed one have coexisted ever since.

The second Chinese base came in July 2005, in Wuhan, Hubei, with the plant running from July 2006. Guangdong put Meiko next to the electronics assembly cluster of the south; Wuhan bought inland cost in the centre. Together the two would supply the world’s handset, automotive-electronics and industrial-equipment makers for the better part of two decades, and would carry the overseas share of sales past 80%.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2007Vietnam, and the one acquisition

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2007 · consolidated
Revenue$554M
Net income$16M
Net margin2.9%
FY2015 · consolidated
Revenue$751M
Net income-$79M
Net margin-10.6%
  1. 2007Meiko Electronics Vietnam founded in Hanoi
  2. 2008Victor circuit business acquired for $12.6M (¥1bn)
  3. 2009Wuhan second plant; Vietnam EMS plant; R&D centre
  4. 2011Vietnam PCB plant starts
  5. 2013Ishinomaki plant; listing moves to TSE JASDAQ
  6. 2014Meiko Electronics Thang Long, Hanoi

In January 2007, with Chinese output barely at full stride, Meiko incorporated Meiko Electronics Vietnam in Hanoi. What moved there was not machinery but a way of running a plant — local staff trained in Japan and then handed the factory, the pattern established in Guangzhou. An EMS plant opened in 2009, an R&D centre the same year, a PCB plant in 2011; Meiko Electronics Thang Long followed in 2014. On that reading, a site shifting from China to Vietnam costs the company relatively little.

The exception to the build-it-yourself rule came in March 2008, when Meiko took over the circuit business of Japan’s Victor Company — boards for DVD players and car navigation — for $12.6M (¥1bn), against consolidated sales of $759.7M (¥79bn) that year. It bought technology, customers and 147 people. It did not buy the market: the contract was signed in January 2008 on an assumption of “sustained expansion in digital consumer electronics,” and within half a year Meiko was delaying the Vietnamese and Wuhan start-ups and winding up the Yokohama plant it had just acquired. Acquisitions have stayed a supplement ever since — a Vietnamese EMS stake in 2019, two embedded-systems firms in 2022 — while the growth axis remained its own construction.

Domestic capacity kept pace with the offshore build rather than shrinking behind it: an Ishinomaki plant in 2013, Meiko Techno in Yamato, Kanagawa in 2015 for assembly, video and industrial equipment. The listing migrated in step with the company’s size — Osaka Securities Exchange JASDAQ in 2010, Tokyo Stock Exchange JASDAQ in 2013.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2016EVs, data centres, and unwinding Wuhan

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2016 · consolidated
Revenue$876M
Net income-$103M
Net margin-11.8%
FY2025 · consolidated
Revenue$1.4B
Net income$100M
Net margin7.2%
  1. 2019Trade war hits Wuhan; operating profit down 43%
  2. 2021EV and data-centre demand lifts sales; TSE First Section
  3. 2022Moves to the Prime Market
  4. 2023Tendo plant; Meiko Electronics Hoa Binh, Vietnam
  5. 2025Record sales of ¥206.8bn in the fiftieth year

The years to March 2019 and March 2020 looked like a plateau — sales of about ¥118.9bn then ¥115.4bn on automotive and industrial boards — but operating profit fell from ¥8.9bn to ¥5.1bn, a drop of 43%, as the US–China trade war shrank orders at Wuhan. The plant was then taking more than 30% of consolidated sales, and the concentration that had been an advantage read, at once, as structural risk. Diversifying into Vietnam moved up the priority list.

Demand then turned Meiko’s way. Vehicle electrification lifted automotive boards, and servers and data centres bid for high-layer-count boards; sales rose from ¥119.2bn in the year to March 2021 to ¥151.2bn, ¥167.2bn, ¥179.4bn and ¥206.8bn in the year to March 2025 — a record, reached in the company’s fiftieth year. Institutional catching-up ran alongside: the First Section of the TSE in 2021, the Prime Market in 2022, embedded-systems subsidiaries the same year, a Tendo plant and Meiko Electronics Hoa Binh in 2023, the Ishinomaki works spun off as Miyagi Meiko in 2024.

The old move is still being made. As Meiko’s smartphone customers pull their supply chains out of China, the company raised capital spending for the year to March 2026 from $200.5M (¥30bn) to $340.8M (¥51bn) — a 70% increase, most of it extending the Vietnamese plants; by March 2025 its fixed assets in Vietnam were 2.5 times those in China. Fifty years on, the product line has climbed from double-sided to multilayer to build-up to thick-copper automotive and high-layer-count data-centre boards without ever leaving the printed wiring board, and Naya Yuichiro, 82, remains president — a tenure of unusual length for a listed Japanese company, with succession now being prepared around Sakate Atsushi and Naya Shigeru.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1980

From double-sided boards into multilayer (1980)

Equipment decides the range of orders you can take

For a printed wiring board company, layer count is not a grade of quality but the very range of work it can accept. Drawings for equipment that routes wiring through inner layers never reach a plant that can only make double-sided boards. In 1980, with orders for game boards still rising, Meiko Denshi Kogyo bought a machine for layers no one had yet ordered. It can be read not as a forecast that demand for double-sided boards would hold, but as a decision to widen, by its own hand, the kinds of drawings that would arrive.

The same choice repeated afterwards. The build-up building of 1997, the new Miyagi block in 2005, and in recent years high-layer-count boards for AI servers — each time the investment went to a layer that was not yet the mainstay. That what remained when the strong yen of 1985 erased its orders was a read on automotive as the next application shows the same disposition. A company that holds the equipment first keeps room to recover from the product-mix side whenever the market turns.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1998

Moving production offshore to Hong Kong and Guangdong (1998)

Becoming the side that leaves

What the company lost to the strong yen of 1985 were orders — not technology, not equipment. Its customers’ factories had merely crossed the sea, and the board makers left in Japan found themselves standing where the work no longer reached. The 1998 move into Hong Kong and Guangdong is the answer to that experience, thirteen years in coming. Placing the trading and procurement window in Hong Kong, building the volume plant in Nansha, and waiting two years for it to run: the sequence has a weight quite unlike the lightness of leaving in pursuit of price alone.

What is interesting is that the same judgement was made twice. In 2007, just as Chinese production became the mainstay, Meiko set up its next company in Vietnam. The operating pattern established in Guangzhou — train local staff in Japan, then hand them the plant — was transferred as it stood to Hanoi. If what moves is the operating pattern rather than the equipment, then little is lost when a base shifts from China to Vietnam. That by the year ended March 2025 Meiko’s tangible fixed assets in Vietnam were 2.5 times those in China marks where that accumulation now stands.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2008

Taking over Victor’s circuit business — a turn to external growth (2008)

What the acquisition added, and what it could not

$12.6M (¥1bn) is small set against the $759.7M (¥79bn) of consolidated sales the company recorded that year. Even so, for a firm that had grown for thirty-three years by building its own plants and hiring its own people, the meaning of taking another company’s division in whole is hard to measure in money. Of the 147 people who transferred, the R&D group joined joint development the following month, while the production arm was moved to Miyagi in under a year. That a single transaction was handled in two different ways inside the company says much about its character.

What could be bought was technology, customers and people; what could not was the market. When the contract was signed in January 2008, Meiko was thickening its supply capacity on the premise of “sustained expansion in digital consumer electronics,” and the subprime problem appeared only as one concern listed among others. Half a year later it was delaying the start-ups in Vietnam and Wuhan and moving to close the Yokohama plant it had just taken over. Since then the main axis of Meiko’s growth has stayed with building its own factories, and acquisitions — the Vietnamese EMS stake in November 2019, the two embedded-systems subsidiaries in September 2022 — have remained in a supporting position.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— Meiko full history in Japanese →

  1. Meiko Co., Ltd. — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports).
  2. Tokio Marine Asset Management — スポットレポート (spot report), March 2025: “Meiko founder Naya Yuichiro and the company’s growth.” PDF.

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer


Data API

Meiko’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/6787/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/6787/history.json History overview
GET /api/6787/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/6787/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/6787/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/6787/executives.json Executives
GET /api/6787/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/6787/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/6787/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/6787/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/6787/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/6787/workforce.json Workforce