Ebara Foods Industry

Company history

Financial history 1968–2026 — revenue, cost structure, balance sheet, cash flow and key ratios, year by year →

Founded
1958
Head office
Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
Listed
2013
Founder
Morimura Kunio
Revenue · FYE Mar 2026
$316.1M (¥50bn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2026
$11.4M (¥2bn)
Ebara Foods Industry: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1958A subcontractor in Yokohama

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
  1. 1958Morimura Kunio founds Ebara Foods in Yokohama
  2. 1965Fewer than ten staff; borrowing at 5% a month

In May 1958 Morimura Kunio, then thirty-nine, set up Ebara Foods in the Matsumi district of Yokohama. He had run the Osaka sales office of Kinkei Foods, a seasoning maker of fruit sauces and ketchup run by his brothers, and chose to go independent in the same trade. The company began as a maker of commercial sauce and ketchup under the Kinkei brand and a contract producer of soup seasonings for instant ramen — a subcontractor in commercial seasonings, selling to restaurants and food manufacturers.

That market belonged to established firms — Bull-Dog Sauce, Kagome — and a small Yokohama maker could match neither their prices nor their volumes. When Morimura began devoting himself to the company full-time in September 1965 it was a workshop of fewer than ten people, renting rooms in a colleague’s house, with monthly sales under $2,778 (¥1m), abandoned by the banks, and carrying $11,111 (¥4m) borrowed privately at 5% a month. Sales were still only $416,667 (¥150m) in fiscal 1968: nearly a decade in, there was no way to break the incumbents’ hold on sauce and ketchup.

Morimura’s answer was not a frontal attack in an established category but entry into one that did not yet exist as a category at all. His miso ramen soup was selling into Chinese restaurants just as yakiniku grill houses were opening across the country and filling with young customers. A grill sauce would sell through butchers, so it would not collide with his own ramen-shop channel. Kagome had launched a barbecue sauce in 1962, which proved the market could exist — but grilling meat at home was not yet a Japanese habit and the product had not spread. After eating his way through dozens of grill houses, Morimura concluded that the hard part of cooking yakiniku at home was the seasoning, and that the tare was what would carry it.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1967The tare, and the mole campaign

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY1968 · unconsolidated
Revenue$417K
Net income
Net margin
FY1977 · unconsolidated
Revenue$33M
Net income
Net margin
  1. 1967Yakiniku no Tare launches
  2. 1968Renamed Ebara Foods Industry
  3. 1970The company bets on national television advertising
  4. 1972Isehara plant opens in Kanagawa
  5. 1973Sales reach $8.4M (¥2bn)

Ebara launched Yakiniku no Tare in 1967. Grilling meat at home was not yet a custom, but spreading supermarkets and household refrigerators were making it possible to buy cheap raw meat and cook it at home. Kagome, first to market in 1962, put its investment into ketchup instead, so promotion of the grill-sauce category stayed limited — which handed the late entrant the chance to take the recognition the incumbent had not claimed. In April 1968 the Kinkei brand was switched to Ebara, and that July the company renamed itself Ebara Foods Industry, aligning the corporate name with the product.

The distinctive choice was where to sell. The battleground for household seasonings was the supermarket aisle, where Bull-Dog and Kagome held the shelves. Ebara concentrated instead on butchers: repeated in-store tastings, and the patient work of earning a spot beside the till in the meat section, where a shopper buying raw meat could be offered the sauce at the moment of purchase. Staff kept the campaign deliberately inconspicuous so the large makers would not notice, and named it the mole campaign — establishing the product as a fixture at the meat counter before Bull-Dog or Kagome reacted. In 1970 the company still had 34 employees and banked with a branch of the regional Bank of Yokohama. Behind the shop work, a distribution structure was built: the country split into eleven blocks, one or two wholesalers under exclusive contract in each, and from them a multi-tier chain of secondary wholesalers and retailers.

In 1970 Ebara bet the company on television. Sales that year were $1.3M (¥450m); the advertising was priced accordingly. Morimura chose Shizuoka for the first campaign — belonging to neither the Tokyo nor the Osaka cultural sphere, it made the ideal test market — then moved into the capital region through Fuji TV at the end of the year, changing the lead performer to the rakugo comedian later known as Tachibanaya Enzo. Each region got six months of concentrated spots tied to in-store demonstrators, tastings, point-of-purchase displays and bulk shelving, so that awareness and purchase moved together. Kagome, again prioritising ketchup, did not answer on air. By fiscal 1973 sales reached $8.4M (¥2bn) and “yakiniku no tare means Ebara” had settled in the market. Roughly a hundred food makers piled into the category in the first half of the 1970s — Momoya launched in 1974 and grew into the number-two position — but the recognition Ebara had bought first held them off. The industry called it the first tare war.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1978Kogen no Aji, 60%, and everything that did not stick

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY1978 · unconsolidated
Revenue$58M
Net income
Net margin
FY1981 · unconsolidated
Revenue$78M
Net income
Net margin
  1. 1978Kogen no Aji launches at twice the going price
  2. 1979Ebara 50%, Momoya 20% — the second tare war
  3. 1981Sales of $77.5M (¥17bn); 60% of the national market
  4. 1988US subsidiary and a restaurant company founded
  5. 1999Restaurant business dissolved (US wound up in 1996)

In 1978 Ebara launched a second grill-sauce brand, Kogen no Aji. Where the category was built on soy sauce, this was based on apple, peach, plum and mango: mild, thick and glossy, with an effect that tenderised the meat. The price went from 180g at $1 (¥150) to 210g at $1 (¥300) — double, at a stroke. When the sales department, certain that nothing sold at twice the price, returned only token forecasts, Morimura gathered every branch manager at a hotel and ordered every number rewritten. The nationwide launch in June 1978 brought in more than twice what the salesmen had forecast. The fruit base was also aimed at the Kansai market, where the Ebara name was still weaker than in the east.

Backed by simultaneous national television advertising, Kogen no Aji did $12.9M (¥3bn) in its first year and rose to share top billing with the original tare. By 1979 the category ranked Ebara at 50%, Momoya 20%, Daisho 14% and Kagome 8% — the second tare war, as the trade press had it. Ebara expanded the Gunma plant in 1980 to a capacity the smaller entrants could not match, and through the 1980s they left the category one by one. Fiscal 1981 sales of $77.5M (¥17bn) were roughly 114 times the $416,667 (¥150m) of thirteen years earlier; the national share of grill sauce was 60%, and 80% in the Kanto and Koshinetsu region around head office. Sukiyaki no Tare followed in 1984 and a Kansai-style soy version in 1987, and the Tsuyama plant in 1994 gave the company a western Japan base.

What the profits from those two products bought did not stick. A frozen-food subsidiary was acquired in 1981, an in-house advertising agency spun out in 1984, and in 1988 both a US subsidiary and a restaurant company were founded — the first to sell the sauce in America, the second to run grill restaurants on the strength of the brand. None of them connected to what Ebara actually possessed: a butcher-and-wholesaler channel, and the ability to formulate a sauce. A major supermarket’s verdict — that outside tare the company’s marketing was weak — was really a comment on how tightly its selling power was bound to one product. The American company was wound up in 1996, the restaurant business dissolved in 1999, and frozen food was sold off in 2006. Each was cut within roughly a decade, before the losses accumulated — decisive, and a habit that left the company with nothing earning outside its one category.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2000A mature category, and the search for the next one

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2000 · unconsolidated
Revenue$370M
Net income$3M
Net margin0.7%
FY2026 · unconsolidated
Revenue$316M
Net income$11M
Net margin3.6%
  1. 2004Lists on JASDAQ, forty-six years after founding
  2. 2012Miyazaki Jun becomes president; profitability first
  3. 2014Moves to the TSE First Section
  4. 2020Morimura Takeshi, the third generation, becomes president
  5. 2022Moves to the TSE Standard market
  6. 2024Ebara Reboot 2026: 50%+ total shareholder return

Growth in grill sauce stopped. Kikkoman entered in 1996 and gained share through the 2000s, the domestic population began to shrink, and Ebara settled into a plateau of roughly $569.7M (¥50bn) in sales — the end of an expansion that had multiplied revenue 114-fold in thirteen years. The company spent the early 2000s tidying its corporate structure and strengthening research, opening a central laboratory in Kanagawa in 2003, and in November of that year registered its shares over the counter, listing on the JASDAQ exchange in December 2004 — forty-six years after it was founded. A Shanghai subsidiary followed in 2005, and the frozen-food business was sold in 2006.

Morimura Kunio died in 2010 at ninety-one. In April 2012 Miyazaki Jun became the fourth president and turned the company toward profitability rather than volume. The 2013 merger of the Tokyo and Osaka exchanges moved the listing to the TSE, and Ebara stepped up to the Second Section in November 2013 and the First Section in December 2014. In 2017 Miyazaki relaunched Kogen no Aji: fruit-based grill sauces were commoditising against Kikkoman and others, and presenting the product as new was a way to refuse the supermarkets’ discount demands and hold a proper margin. Sales dipped while old stock cleared, but promotional spending fell from $66M (¥7bn) in fiscal 2016 to $58M (¥6bn) the next year, lifting the operating margin by a point.

In April 2020 Morimura Takeshi — son of the second president and the founder’s grandson — became the fifth president, the third generation of the family in the job, days before the government declared a state of emergency over COVID-19. Home cooking surged: fiscal 2020 brought record consolidated results, with sales of $467.3M (¥51bn), operating profit of $32.8M (¥4bn) and net profit of $22.8M (¥3bn). The strategic answer to a shrinking household, though, is smaller packages: the Puchitto line of single-serve seasoning pods for hotpot, udon and Chinese dishes is positioned as the growth category, alongside the first new Kogen no Aji flavour in decades, a citrus version launched in 2020.

The second growth axis is Southeast Asia, approached the opposite way to 1988: subsidiaries in Taiwan (2017), Singapore (2018), Thailand (2021) and Malaysia (2022) sell products made in Japanese plants into local food service and retail, a light model designed to keep the cost of withdrawal low. In April 2022 the exchange’s restructuring moved Ebara from the First Section to the Standard market. The mid-term plan running to March 2026, Ebara Reboot 2026, sets EBITDA of $25.3M (¥4bn), overseas sales of at least 5% of the total — and, in front of both, a total shareholder return ratio of 50% or more. For a maker holding 60% of a category in a shrinking country, with the next pillar not yet settled, the promise put at the centre of the plan is not growth but the return of the cash the one category earns. Sales in the year to March 2026 were $316.1M (¥50bn).

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1988

A US subsidiary and a restaurant chain — and two withdrawals (1988)

Can a way of eating be exported?

The product created its own market by planting a way of eating — grill the meat, dip it in the tare — in Japanese homes. Carry that pattern of success abroad, or into restaurants, and the same thing should happen: something like that reading seems to lie behind the two companies founded in 1988. But spreading a way of eating at the family table, running premises and serving customers a meal, and winning shelf space in a country that eats differently call for capabilities that barely overlap. A method of selling built on visiting butcher after butcher and running tastings was bound to a specific physical place — the meat counter in Japan.

Twenty years after the two withdrawals, the company is abroad again. This time there is no local production: goods made in Japanese plants flow from local sales bases into food service and retail, and the mid-term plan sets a modest target of overseas sales at 5% or more. The 1988 decision left its problem not in the scale of the move but in the design of how to make it. How far a company can carry outside a food culture it created itself is being tested again, now in the markets of Southeast Asia.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2006

Full withdrawal from frozen food, advertising and logistics (2006)

The strength of one point, and its other side

That a company which had created the grill-sauce product itself should use the money from that success to look for a second pillar is, as a way of growing, nothing unusual. In Ebara’s case, though, the places chosen — frozen food, advertising, restaurants, the United States — were scattered wide, and none of them connected directly to its own channel of butchers and food wholesalers, or to the skill of formulating the taste of a sauce. The verdict of a major supermarket, that outside tare the company’s marketing was inferior, can also be read as pointing out that it was not the strength of the product but the strength of the delivery that was bound to one particular product.

The withdrawals themselves came quickly. Eight years in America, eleven in restaurants, and frozen food handed to another company without waiting for the losses to pile up. Rather than hold on and widen the wound, the pattern was repeated of letting go at the stage where no contribution to earnings could be foreseen. On the other hand, as a result of continuing to choose narrowing over widening, consolidated sales have stayed around $569.7M (¥50bn) for twenty years. How far outside a profitable narrow market a company should venture — the same question can be seen carried forward into the Southeast Asian expansion of the 2020s and the acquisitions around the commercial-use business.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2003

Over-the-counter registration and listing on JASDAQ (2003)

A yardstick taken up forty-six years late

A company that had made a market of its own and run debt-free on thin capital finally came onto an exchange in its forty-sixth year. That it did not hurry to go public expresses well the character of a business that does not need money. What the trade press recorded of the fate of the founder’s elder brother’s company had shown him a live example of the fact that going public does not necessarily make a company stronger. The distinguishing feature of this decision is that listing was chosen not when growth needed funding, but rather when the core business was slowing and the shape of the group was being tidied up.

The twenty years since have been a climb up the market sections and back down again. Eight years after the promotion to the First Section came the move to the Standard market, and the mid-term plan puts the promise of shareholder returns, rather than a story of growth, at the front. Meanwhile the largest shareholder’s stake exceeds one-third and the founding family still runs the company. How to hold together those two things — submitting to an outside yardstick and keeping decision-making within the family — appears to be a question still open twenty years after the listing.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— Ebara Foods Industry full history in Japanese →

  1. Ebara Foods Industry Co., Ltd. — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports).
  2. Ebara Foods Industry Co., Ltd. — company account of the 1967 launch of Yakiniku no Tare (corporate website).
  3. Nikkei Style — interview with Ebara Foods’ head of product development on the founding years.
  4. Sogo Shokuhin — 総合食品, March 1979 (category shares in the second tare war). NDL Digital Collections.
  5. Ebara Foods Industry Co., Ltd. — earnings presentation, FY2017 (決算説明会資料).

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer


Data API

Ebara Foods Industry’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/2819/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/2819/history.json History overview
GET /api/2819/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/2819/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/2819/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/2819/executives.json Executives
GET /api/2819/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/2819/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/2819/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/2819/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/2819/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/2819/workforce.json Workforce