Founded in 1878. Starting as the Kawasaki Tsukiji Shipyard, the company diversified into naval vessels, aircraft, and railway rolling stock. Split into three companies during postwar zaibatsu dissolution, the firms re-merged in 1969. Expanding the Kawasaki motorcycle brand globally, the company has developed into a comprehensive heavy industry manufacturer with pillars in defense, aircraft components, railway rolling stock, and industrial robots.
1878
Strategic Decision
Kawasaki Tsukiji Shipyard founded
From Tsukiji to Kobe—how location choice determined the fate of a shipbuilder
1896
Strategic Decision
Kawasaki Dockyard Co., Ltd. established
The pendulum of boom and crisis created by a naval-dependent business structure
1919
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line) established
1919Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line) established
1928
Railway rolling stock business spun off; Kawasaki Rolling Stock Co. established (with collateral assignment)
1928Railway rolling stock business spun off; Kawasaki Rolling Stock Co. established (with collateral assignment)
1931
Strategic Decision
Composition filing following naval disarmament
Survival as national policy—the structure that prevented the government from letting the shipyard fail
1937
Aircraft business spun off; Kawasaki Aircraft Industries established
1937Aircraft business spun off; Kawasaki Aircraft Industries established
1939
Company name changed to Kawasaki Heavy Industries
1939Company name changed to Kawasaki Heavy Industries
1949
Reconstruction plan approved (shipbuilding, machinery, and electrical divisions only)
1949Reconstruction plan approved (shipbuilding, machinery, and electrical divisions only)
1961
Divisional organization adopted
1961Divisional organization adopted
1966
Domestic production facilities expanded
1966Domestic production facilities expanded
1966
North American motorcycle expansion launched
1966North American motorcycle expansion launched
1969
Three-way merger of Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Kawasaki Aircraft, and Kawasaki Rolling Stock
1969Three-way merger of Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Kawasaki Aircraft, and Kawasaki Rolling Stock
1969
Entered the industrial robot market
1969Entered the industrial robot market
1971
Merged with Kisha Seizo Kaisha (locomotive manufacturer)
1971Merged with Kisha Seizo Kaisha (locomotive manufacturer)
1976
Commercial sales of industrial gas turbines commenced
1976Commercial sales of industrial gas turbines commenced
1977
Management rationalization initiated
1977Management rationalization initiated
1978
Licensed production of P-3C maritime patrol aircraft commenced
1978Licensed production of P-3C maritime patrol aircraft commenced
1990
Full-scale production of aircraft components for Boeing commenced
1990Full-scale production of aircraft components for Boeing commenced
1997
Production of subway cars for the New York City Transit Authority commenced
1997Production of subway cars for the New York City Transit Authority commenced
2001
Shipbuilding business integration with IHI called off
2001Shipbuilding business integration with IHI called off
2013
President Hasegawa dismissed
2013President Hasegawa dismissed
2015
Withdrew from the construction machinery business
2015Withdrew from the construction machinery business
2017
Structural reform of the ship and offshore business
2017Structural reform of the ship and offshore business
2020
Group Vision 2030 formulated
2020Group Vision 2030 formulated
2024
Strong sales to the Ministry of Defense
2024Strong sales to the Ministry of Defense
View Performance
RevenueKawasaki Heavy Industries:Revenue
Non-consol. | Consolidated (Unit: ¥100M)
¥1.8T
Revenue:2024/3
ProfitKawasaki Heavy Industries:Net Profit Margin
Non-consol. | Consolidated (Unit: %)
1.3%
Margin:2024/3
View Performance
PeriodTypeRevenueProfit*Margin
1950/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1951/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1952/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1953/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1954/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1955/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1956/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1957/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1958/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1959/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1960/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1961/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1962/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1963/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1964/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1965/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1966/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1967/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1968/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1969/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1970/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1971/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1972/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1973/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1974/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1975/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1976/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥490B¥11B2.1%
1977/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥540B¥13B2.4%
1978/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥566B¥10B1.6%
1979/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥501B-¥6B-1.2%
1980/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥502B¥3B0.5%
1981/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥648B¥3B0.4%
1982/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥764B¥4B0.5%
1983/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥687B-¥6B-0.9%
1984/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥703B-¥7B-1.0%
1985/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥715B¥6B0.8%
1986/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1987/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1988/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1989/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1990/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1991/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1992/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1993/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.1T¥14B1.3%
1994/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.1T¥17B1.5%
1995/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.1T¥10B0.9%
1996/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.1T¥17B1.5%
1997/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.2T¥23B1.8%
1998/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.3T¥19B1.4%
1999/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.2T-¥6B-0.6%
2000/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.1T-¥19B-1.7%
2001/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.1T-¥10B-1.0%
2002/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.1T¥6B0.5%
2003/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.2T¥13B1.0%
2004/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.2T¥6B0.5%
2005/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.2T¥11B0.9%
2006/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.3T¥16B1.2%
2007/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.4T¥30B2.0%
2008/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.5T¥35B2.3%
2009/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.3T¥12B0.8%
2010/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.2T-¥11B-1.0%
2011/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.2T¥26B2.1%
2012/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.3T¥15B1.1%
2013/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.3T¥31B2.3%
2014/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.4T¥39B2.7%
2015/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.5T¥52B3.4%
2016/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.5T¥46B2.9%
2017/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.5T¥26B1.7%
2018/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.6T¥29B1.8%
2019/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.6T¥27B1.7%
2020/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.6T¥19B1.1%
2021/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.5T-¥19B-1.3%
2022/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.5T¥13B0.8%
2023/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.7T¥53B3.0%
2024/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥1.8T¥25B1.3%
Disclaimer
Japan Corporate History & Strategy uses Google Analytics, provided by Google LLC, to improve quality. Information held by visitors (IP address, visited URL, referrer URL, visit timestamp, and device information) is transmitted to Google LLC. This website is compiled from publicly available information by an individual developer and represents personal views. We do not guarantee accuracy, completeness, or timeliness. The developer assumes no liability for any damages arising from the use of information on this website.
1878
4

Kawasaki Tsukiji Shipyard founded

From Tsukiji to Kobe—how location choice determined the fate of a shipbuilder

What is noteworthy in Kawasaki Shozo's entry into shipbuilding is the decision to relocate from Tsukiji, Tokyo to Kobe. During the Meiji era, the shipping industry was increasingly centering on Kobe, and the superiority of a shipyard's location directly influenced its order-winning capability. Securing the transfer of the government-owned Hyogo Shipyard on a 50-year installment plan was proof of the Meiji government's trust, and this relocation established the company's position as second only to Mitsubishi. This is a case demonstrating that location choice is the source of competitive advantage in shipbuilding.

BackgroundEntry into shipbuilding from the trading business

In post-Meiji Restoration Japan, the modernization of maritime transport was being promoted under the national policies of fukoku kyohei (enriching the country, strengthening the military) and shokusan kogyo (promoting industry), and shipbuilding attracted attention as an industry with promising future growth. Following the lifting of the ban on large ship construction triggered by Commodore Perry's arrival in 1853, powerful capitalists including Mitsubishi successively entered the shipbuilding business, and the establishment of modern shipyards became active.

In this environment, Kawasaki Shozo, who had been engaged in the trading business, identified a business opportunity in the future demand for vessels driven by the expansion of maritime transport, and decided to enter the shipbuilding business. In April 1878 (Meiji 11), he founded the Kawasaki Tsukiji Shipyard in Tsukiji, Tokyo. Engaged in new shipbuilding and repair work, the shipyard had approximately 600 employees by Meiji 20, steadily building its foundation as a private shipyard.

DecisionAcquisition of the government-owned Hyogo Shipyard and expansion to Kobe

However, the Tsukiji shipyard in Tokyo had limited room for expansion. With the prospect that the shipping industry would develop centered on Kobe, Kawasaki Shozo decided to relocate his base to achieve a leap forward in the business. In 1896, he received the transfer of the 'government-owned Hyogo Shipyard' from the Meiji government and relocated from Tokyo to Kobe. The transfer was structured as a 50-year installment payment plan, reflecting the Meiji government's high regard for Kawasaki Shozo's contributions to shipbuilding and his creditworthiness.

After the move to Kobe, the business expanded steadily. Over the 10 years from Meiji 20 to Meiji 29, the shipyard handled 80 new vessels and 589 repair jobs, emerging as the second-largest shipyard in Japan after Mitsubishi. The shipbuilding technology and customer base cultivated during this period laid the foundation for the later establishment of Kawasaki Dockyard Co., Ltd. and its evolution into the present-day Kawasaki Heavy Industries.

From Tsukiji to Kobe—how location choice determined the fate of a shipbuilder

What is noteworthy in Kawasaki Shozo's entry into shipbuilding is the decision to relocate from Tsukiji, Tokyo to Kobe. During the Meiji era, the shipping industry was increasingly centering on Kobe, and the superiority of a shipyard's location directly influenced its order-winning capability. Securing the transfer of the government-owned Hyogo Shipyard on a 50-year installment plan was proof of the Meiji government's trust, and this relocation established the company's position as second only to Mitsubishi. This is a case demonstrating that location choice is the source of competitive advantage in shipbuilding.

TimelineKawasaki Tsukiji Shipyard founded — Key Events
4/1878Kawasaki Tsukiji Shipyard founded
1887Kawasaki Hyogo Shipyard established (government transfer)
Installment payment50years
1896
10

Kawasaki Dockyard Co., Ltd. established

The pendulum of boom and crisis created by a naval-dependent business structure

Kawasaki Dockyard established its naval vessel construction capability through incorporation and the construction of a large dock, growing into a leading shipbuilding company. However, this growth came with high dependence on naval demand, creating a pendulum structure where performance surged during military expansion but demand plummeted during disarmament. The appointment of Matsukata Kojiro as president demonstrates the rationality of pursuing government orders, but conversely, it was management dependent on the relationship with the Navy. The root cause of the management crisis leading to the 1931 composition filing lay in the business structure formed during this period.

BackgroundIncorporation aimed at business succession

Seeking the perpetual development of his shipbuilding business, Kawasaki Shozo decided in October 1896 to convert from sole proprietorship to incorporation, establishing Kawasaki Dockyard Co., Ltd. (now Kawasaki Heavy Industries). At the time of establishment, Kawasaki Shozo's shareholding was limited to 21.48%, clearly demonstrating the intent to ensure business succession while avoiding concentration of capital in the founder. The company had 1,800 employees at the time of its establishment, already operating as a shipyard of considerable scale.

Matsukata Kojiro, the third son of then-Prime Minister of Japan Matsukata Masayoshi, was appointed as the first president. The aim was to leverage the Matsukata family's political and business connections and credibility to gain an advantage in securing government orders, primarily from the Navy. By entrusting management to the next generation, Kawasaki Shozo sought to build an organizational management structure independent of the founder.

DecisionConstruction of a large dock and shift toward naval demand

On the capital investment front, in November 1902, a '6,000-ton dry dock' was completed at the Kobe Shipyard after approximately six years of construction. This was one of the largest shipbuilding facilities in Japan at the time, equipped with the capacity to construct large vessels and naval warships. In 1915, the battlecruiser Haruna was completed at the Kobe Shipyard, establishing naval vessel construction as a core business.

Thereafter, Kawasaki Dockyard expanded its shipbuilding operations primarily through naval vessel orders from the Navy. However, the structure of heavy dependence on naval demand meant that the company's performance was highly susceptible to fluctuations driven by shifts between military expansion and disarmament policies. This business structure dependent on the Navy would later become a precursor to the management crisis during the Showa Depression.

The pendulum of boom and crisis created by a naval-dependent business structure

Kawasaki Dockyard established its naval vessel construction capability through incorporation and the construction of a large dock, growing into a leading shipbuilding company. However, this growth came with high dependence on naval demand, creating a pendulum structure where performance surged during military expansion but demand plummeted during disarmament. The appointment of Matsukata Kojiro as president demonstrates the rationality of pursuing government orders, but conversely, it was management dependent on the relationship with the Navy. The root cause of the management crisis leading to the 1931 composition filing lay in the business structure formed during this period.

TimelineKawasaki Dockyard Co., Ltd. established — Key Events
10/1896Kawasaki Dockyard Co., Ltd. established
1906Hyogo Factory established (railway rolling stock)
12/1922Gifu Factory established (aircraft)
9/1940Akashi Factory established
Back to Home