Founded in 1936. Building on insulator technology, the company established the leading domestic market share in spark plugs and expanded into semiconductor package substrates. As a global manufacturer of automotive spark plugs, it has continued to grow alongside advances in engine technology.
1936
Strategic Decision
Establishment of NGK Spark Plug Co., Ltd.
The prototype of domestic monopoly born from insulator-derived ceramic firing technology and wartime import disruption
1945
2,000 employees laid off following the end of the war
19452,000 employees laid off following the end of the war
1949
Listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange
1949Listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange
1956
Spark plug production improvements
1956Spark plug production improvements
1959
Local spark plug production commenced in Brazil
1959Local spark plug production commenced in Brazil
1962
Komaki factory established; shift to expanded plug production capacity
1962Komaki factory established; shift to expanded plug production capacity
1966
Achieved 70% domestic market share in spark plugs; high profitability from aftermarket sales
1966Achieved 70% domestic market share in spark plugs; high profitability from aftermarket sales
1966
Established a subsidiary in the United States
1966Established a subsidiary in the United States
1967
Commenced manufacturing and sales of ceramic IC packages
1967Commenced manufacturing and sales of ceramic IC packages
1972
Price increase implemented for Super Plugs
1972Price increase implemented for Super Plugs
1973
Full-scale local production commenced in Southeast Asia
1973Full-scale local production commenced in Southeast Asia
1975
Sales bases expanded in Europe, the U.S., and Australia
1975Sales bases expanded in Europe, the U.S., and Australia
1982
Entry into automotive oxygen sensors
1982Entry into automotive oxygen sensors
1990
Full-scale local production commenced in advanced economies
1990Full-scale local production commenced in advanced economies
1998
Full-scale mass production of resin packages for Intel
1998Full-scale mass production of resin packages for Intel
2003
Production expansion in Asia
2003Production expansion in Asia
2007
Increased production of semiconductor packages; expansion plan at the Komaki factory
2007Increased production of semiconductor packages; expansion plan at the Komaki factory
2009
Strategic Decision
Net loss recorded; restructuring of ceramic IC package business
A decade of neglecting the materials transition, until the financial crisis pulled the trigger on withdrawal
2013
Strategic Decision
Announcement of one-billion-unit spark plug production plan
The asymmetry of ceramic technology: declining in semiconductors while remaining a barrier in spark plugs
2023
English trade name changed to Niterra Co., Ltd.
2023English trade name changed to Niterra Co., Ltd.
2024
Record-high profit achieved
2024Record-high profit achieved
View Performance
RevenueNGK Spark Plug (Niterra):Revenue
Non-consol. | Consolidated (Unit: ¥100M)
¥614B
Revenue:2024/3
ProfitNGK Spark Plug (Niterra):Net Profit Margin
Non-consol. | Consolidated (Unit: %)
13.4%
Margin:2024/3
View Performance
PeriodTypeRevenueProfit*Margin
1950/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1951/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1952/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥0B--
1953/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥0B--
1954/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥1B--
1955/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥1B--
1956/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥1B--
1957/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥1B¥0B14.6%
1958/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥1B¥0B12.4%
1959/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥1B¥0B10.5%
1960/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥1B¥0B10.5%
1961/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥2B¥0B10.9%
1962/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥2B¥0B12.6%
1963/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥3B¥0B11.5%
1964/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥3B¥0B9.8%
1965/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥4B¥0B9.2%
1966/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥4B¥0B9.2%
1967/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1968/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1969/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1970/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥10B--
1971/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥13B--
1972/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥14B--
1973/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥15B--
1974/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥20B--
1975/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥22B--
1976/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥23B¥1B4.4%
1977/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥28B¥2B6.0%
1978/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥32B¥2B6.5%
1979/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥36B¥2B5.6%
1980/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥44B¥2B5.0%
1981/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥50B¥2B4.2%
1982/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥55B¥2B4.1%
1983/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥59B¥2B4.0%
1984/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥66B¥3B3.7%
1985/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥81B¥5B5.5%
1986/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1987/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1988/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥86B¥4B4.5%
1989/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥93B¥5B4.9%
1990/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥106B¥5B5.0%
1991/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥107B¥5B4.4%
1992/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥111B¥4B3.4%
1993/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1994/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1995/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1996/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥158B¥5B3.1%
1997/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥180B¥9B4.7%
1998/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥172B¥8B4.4%
1999/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥189B¥5B2.8%
2000/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥196B¥7B3.3%
2001/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥224B¥13B5.7%
2002/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥221B¥5B2.1%
2003/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥229B¥7B3.1%
2004/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥229B¥11B4.8%
2005/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥241B¥17B7.0%
2006/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥285B¥25B8.8%
2007/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥345B¥34B9.8%
2008/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥346B¥22B6.3%
2009/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥292B-¥72B-24.6%
2010/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥244B¥14B5.5%
2011/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥269B¥24B8.7%
2012/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥285B¥26B8.9%
2013/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥303B¥21B6.9%
2014/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥330B¥33B9.9%
2015/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥348B¥37B10.5%
2016/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥383B¥31B8.0%
2017/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥373B¥26B6.8%
2018/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥410B¥44B10.8%
2019/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥425B¥43B10.0%
2020/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥426B¥34B7.8%
2021/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥428B¥38B8.9%
2022/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥492B¥60B12.2%
2023/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥563B¥66B11.7%
2024/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥614B¥83B13.4%
Disclaimer
Japan Corporate History & Strategy uses Google Analytics, provided by Google LLC, to improve quality. Information held by visitors (IP address, visited URL, referrer URL, visit timestamp, and device information) is transmitted to Google LLC. This website is compiled from publicly available information by an individual developer and represents personal views. We do not guarantee accuracy, completeness, or timeliness. The developer assumes no liability for any damages arising from the use of information on this website.
1936
10

Establishment of NGK Spark Plug Co., Ltd.

The prototype of domestic monopoly born from insulator-derived ceramic firing technology and wartime import disruption

The technological foundation of spark plugs lay in the firing technology of an insulator manufacturer, and Ezoe required nine years from the start of research to commercialization and 15 years to the establishment of the company. The coincidence of having established technology in the high-barrier domain of ceramic firing with the wartime disruption of imports created the structure in which NGK Spark Plug monopolized the market as the sole domestic specialist manufacturer. The combination of technical depth and environmental coincidence structurally made later entrants' market entry difficult—herein lies the origin of that competitive position.

BackgroundAn insulator manufacturer's engineer identified the untapped market for spark plugs

Magoemon Ezoe, an engineer working on insulating components at NGK Insulators, recognized the potential of automotive spark plugs, which were gaining traction overseas in 1921, and initiated in-house research and development. However, spark plug insulators required electrical insulation performance, mechanical strength, and thermal shock resistance far beyond those of ordinary ceramics, necessitating an extended development period from raw material selection through the establishment of firing techniques. In 1926, 1,000 prototypes were produced but defects were discovered, and the decision was made to halt sales plans citing the need for thorough quality control.

Development of improved yields continued, and in 1930, manufacturing and sales of automotive spark plugs finally commenced. Approximately nine years elapsed from the start of research to commercialization, and even though the concept of adapting ceramic firing technology derived from insulator manufacturing proved correct, the technical hurdles to creating a viable product were substantial. Throughout the 1930s, as domestic automakers including Toyota Motor grew and domestic demand for spark plugs expanded, Ezoe's nine years of accumulated technical expertise began to function as a business foundation.

DecisionSpin-off of the spark plug business and establishment of NGK Spark Plug

To meet growing demand accompanying the domestic production of automobiles, NGK Insulators decided to spin off its spark plug business and established NGK Spark Plug in 1936 with capital of one million yen. The headquarters factory was constructed adjacent to NGK Insulators, commencing operations with 259 employees. Magoemon Ezoe, who had been at the forefront of development for nine years, was appointed the first president, creating a structure in which the researcher directly served as the top executive.

The timing of NGK Spark Plug's establishment proved fortuitous. Under the wartime regime, imports from Bosch of Germany and AC of the United States were cut off, and domestic automakers had no choice but to switch to domestic procurement. NGK Spark Plug, as the sole domestic specialist manufacturer, attracted orders and expanded its operations by capturing wartime demand. The disruption of imports created a market monopoly opportunity for a newly established company.

ResultA domestic monopoly created by import disruption and the accumulation of technology for the postwar era

During the war, the company also manufactured spark plugs for aircraft, and by March 1945, the workforce had swelled to 2,887 employees. However, with the end of the war, military demand vanished, and the company underwent a drastic adjustment, laying off approximately 2,600 employees and shrinking to about 200 workers. The rapid wartime expansion followed by sharp postwar contraction was a consequence of the demand structure's heavy reliance on military orders.

However, the mass production techniques and equipment operation experience accumulated during wartime were put to use again as the postwar automobile industry revived. What began as a division of an insulator manufacturer evolved through spin-off and import disruption to achieve a dominant position in the domestic market, forming the business foundation for NGK Spark Plug going forward. Ezoe's research, which began in 1921, culminated in the establishment of a company after more than 15 years.

The prototype of domestic monopoly born from insulator-derived ceramic firing technology and wartime import disruption

The technological foundation of spark plugs lay in the firing technology of an insulator manufacturer, and Ezoe required nine years from the start of research to commercialization and 15 years to the establishment of the company. The coincidence of having established technology in the high-barrier domain of ceramic firing with the wartime disruption of imports created the structure in which NGK Spark Plug monopolized the market as the sole domestic specialist manufacturer. The combination of technical depth and environmental coincidence structurally made later entrants' market entry difficult—herein lies the origin of that competitive position.

TimelineEstablishment of NGK Spark Plug Co., Ltd. — Key Events
4/1921NGK Insulators: Commencement of spark plug research
8/1926NGK Insulators: Spark plug sales halted due to defect discovery
9/1930NGK Insulators: Sales of automotive spark plugs commenced
4/1937NGK Spark Plug Co., Ltd. established (spun off from NGK Insulators)
Paid-in capital100ten thousand yen
4/1937Manufacturing of NGK spark plugs commenced
1945
2,000 employees laid off following the end of the war
1949
Listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange
1956
Spark plug production improvements
1959
Local spark plug production commenced in Brazil
1962
Komaki factory established; shift to expanded plug production capacity
1966
Achieved 70% domestic market share in spark plugs; high profitability from aftermarket sales
1966
Established a subsidiary in the United States
1967
Commenced manufacturing and sales of ceramic IC packages
1972
Price increase implemented for Super Plugs
1973
Full-scale local production commenced in Southeast Asia
1975
Sales bases expanded in Europe, the U.S., and Australia
1982
Entry into automotive oxygen sensors
1990
Full-scale local production commenced in advanced economies
1998
Full-scale mass production of resin packages for Intel
2003
Production expansion in Asia
2007
Increased production of semiconductor packages; expansion plan at the Komaki factory
2009
3

Net loss recorded; restructuring of ceramic IC package business

A decade of neglecting the materials transition, until the financial crisis pulled the trigger on withdrawal

The direction of the materials transition from ceramics to plastic had been set by Intel's 1996 decision, but it took NGK Spark Plug more than 10 years to begin substantive reductions of ceramic manufacturing equipment. Overcapacity that accumulated during that period was written off en masse when demand collapsed in the financial crisis. The business restructuring, accompanied by the departure of the responsible Senior Vice President, suggests organizational inertia whereby structural problems tend not to be resolved without an external shock.

BackgroundThe global financial crisis exposed excess capacity in the semiconductor package business

The 2008 global financial crisis caused a sharp decline in semiconductor demand, significantly reducing IC package orders. NGK Spark Plug recorded a total of 26.6 billion yen in impairment losses on ceramic IC package manufacturing equipment across five domestic factories. Some manufacturing sites had no prospect of resuming operations, resulting in substantial write-downs of asset values. The structural contraction of ceramic demand due to materials transition, compounded by the demand collapse from the economic downturn, caused overcapacity to become suddenly apparent.

As a result, NGK Spark Plug fell into a net loss of 71.6 billion yen in FY2008. The ceramic manufacturing equipment that had been maintained since the late 1990s despite the ongoing transition to plastic was written off en masse, triggered by the financial crisis. The contraction of ceramic demand was a structural change, not a cyclical issue, but it was the external shock of the financial crisis that caused it to materialize all at once in the form of massive impairment charges.

DecisionThe Senior Vice President overseeing ICT was stepped down; pivot back to the automotive business

In May 2009, NGK Spark Plug announced changes to its representative director lineup. Senior Vice President Kato, who had been overseeing the information and communications business (ceramic IC packages), was moved to an advisory role, while Kawahara and Kawashita, both from the automotive business background, were appointed as Representative Senior Vice Presidents. With the person responsible for the ICT business stepping down from the executive core, NGK Spark Plug shifted to a management structure focused on automotive-related businesses.

Simultaneously, the company embarked on restructuring its ceramic IC package operations. Manufacturing subsidiaries with deteriorated financial positions were consolidated into a single entity, and a policy of gradually scaling down ceramic IC package production was announced. The semiconductor package business that had been developed for approximately 40 years since 1967 was set on a path of contraction under the dual impact of materials transition and the financial crisis.

ResultClarification of management policy through selection and concentration on automotive-related businesses

The changes in executive responsibility and business restructuring clarified the priorities within NGK Spark Plug's business portfolio. The company pivoted from a structure of growth based on the twin pillars of automotive spark plugs and semiconductor packages to a policy of concentrating resources on automotive-related businesses. Subsequent capital expenditure was tilted toward automotive operations, leading to the concentrated investment in automotive businesses under the 6th Medium-Term Management Plan in 2013.

The net loss of 71.6 billion yen and the 26.6 billion yen in impairment charges were the cost of having continued to maintain ceramic IC package manufacturing facilities. While the structural contraction of ceramic demand had been foreseeable since Intel's materials transition decision in 1996, it took more than 10 years to reach a decision on asset disposal and business downsizing. The result was that an external shock pulled the trigger on business withdrawal.

A decade of neglecting the materials transition, until the financial crisis pulled the trigger on withdrawal

The direction of the materials transition from ceramics to plastic had been set by Intel's 1996 decision, but it took NGK Spark Plug more than 10 years to begin substantive reductions of ceramic manufacturing equipment. Overcapacity that accumulated during that period was written off en masse when demand collapsed in the financial crisis. The business restructuring, accompanied by the departure of the responsible Senior Vice President, suggests organizational inertia whereby structural problems tend not to be resolved without an external shock.

TimelineNet loss recorded; restructuring of ceramic IC package business — Key Events
3/2009Fell into net loss
5/2009Mr. Kato stepped down as Representative Senior Vice President
5/2009Restructuring of ceramic IC package business commenced
2013
5

Announcement of one-billion-unit spark plug production plan

The asymmetry of ceramic technology: declining in semiconductors while remaining a barrier in spark plugs

NGK Spark Plug's ceramic firing technology lost its market value in semiconductor packages due to the materials transition to plastic, yet it continued to function as a high entry barrier in spark plugs. The essence of the 6th Medium-Term Management Plan was the decision to concentrate resources on the effective market amid an asymmetric structure where the same technological base received diametrically opposite evaluations depending on the market. The 28 billion yen investment in the domestically built Futano factory was also a choice to maintain the concentration of technical expertise.

BackgroundConcentrated investment in automotive business following retreat from semiconductor packages

Following the 2009 restructuring of the ceramic IC package business, NGK Spark Plug had articulated a clear policy of concentrating management resources on automotive-related operations. With one of the former twin pillars—semiconductor packages—in decline, there was a need to position the remaining automotive spark plug business as the growth driver. The 6th Medium-Term Management Plan announced in 2013 translated this policy into specific numerical targets and capital expenditure plans.

The centerpiece of the plan was a target to increase spark plug production to 'one billion units' by the end of FY2020. The FY2013 capital expenditure plan committed approximately 46 billion yen to automotive-related businesses and promoted efficiency gains by consolidating production of each component at a single factory. Previously, the same components had been manufactured at different factories, but the transition aimed for concentrated production of major components (insulators, metal shells, terminal components, etc.) at one factory each.

DecisionNew Futano factory built domestically to maintain the concentration of ceramic firing expertise

The core of the production expansion plan was the Futano factory (Kani, Gifu Prefecture), newly established as the insulator production base. The first phase investment amounted to 28 billion yen, representing a major single investment for NGK Spark Plug. Against the backdrop of aging at the main Komaki factory, the Futano factory also served as a replacement for the Komaki facility.

The decision to build a new factory domestically rather than overseas was driven by the high technical difficulty of ceramic processing. As spark plug insulators are based on alumina firing technology, there was a rational basis for maintaining the production base domestically to leverage the accumulated technology and human resources. The decision prioritized the concentration of technical expertise over the lower labor costs available in emerging economies.

ResultRealization of 'selection and concentration' through a return to automotive focus

The 6th Medium-Term Management Plan and the establishment of the Futano factory marked a turning point that consolidated NGK Spark Plug's business structure into automotive operations. From the twin-pillar structure of 'automotive plus semiconductors' maintained for approximately 45 years since 1967, the company materialized its selection and concentration on automotive businesses through capital expenditure. Investment in semiconductor packages was scaled back, with the freed resources redirected to automotive operations.

With 28 billion yen invested in the Futano factory and planned investments layered across other sites, the company aimed to strengthen its global spark plug supply system. Ceramic firing technology, the same technological base, had seen its market shrink in semiconductor packages, but it remained a source of entry barriers in spark plugs. Amid a structure where the same technology met different fates in different markets, NGK Spark Plug chose to concentrate on the market where the technology remained effective.

The asymmetry of ceramic technology: declining in semiconductors while remaining a barrier in spark plugs

NGK Spark Plug's ceramic firing technology lost its market value in semiconductor packages due to the materials transition to plastic, yet it continued to function as a high entry barrier in spark plugs. The essence of the 6th Medium-Term Management Plan was the decision to concentrate resources on the effective market amid an asymmetric structure where the same technological base received diametrically opposite evaluations depending on the market. The 28 billion yen investment in the domestically built Futano factory was also a choice to maintain the concentration of technical expertise.

TimelineAnnouncement of one-billion-unit spark plug production plan — Key Events
5/20136th Medium-Term Management Plan announced
4/2014Futano factory established (insulators)
Planned investment amount280100M JPY
4/2015New factory established in Thailand (metal shells)
Planned investment amount30100M JPY
2/2016New factory established in Komaki (electrodes and terminal components)
Planned investment amount70100M JPY
2023
English trade name changed to Niterra Co., Ltd.
2024
Record-high profit achieved
Back to Home