Established in 1942. Founded as a wartime state-controlled company, the company transformed its business in the postwar era from cold storage and seafood processing to frozen foods. Creating household frozen food hits such as 'Honkaku Itame Chahan' and 'Toku Kara,' the company grew into a comprehensive cold chain enterprise powered by both its food and logistics businesses.
1942
Strategic Decision
Established Imperial Fisheries Control Co., Ltd.
The unintentional entry barrier of approximately 220 nationwide bases formed by state-directed consolidation
1945
Changed company name to Nippon Reizo Co., Ltd.
1945Changed company name to Nippon Reizo Co., Ltd.
1949
Listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange
1949Listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange
1951
Strategic Decision
Entered the processed food business
The exploratory process where dispersed investment across five areas led to concentration on frozen foods
1956
Entered the livestock products business
1956Entered the livestock products business
1970
Strategic Decision
Continued capital investment
The cost and consequences of an expansion strategy that supplemented investment exceeding profits with borrowings
1980
Strategic Decision
Seafood division fell into deficit
The structural shift from 'volume to profitability' forced by the founding business's deficit
1981
Switched fried chicken raw materials to imported procurement
1981Switched fried chicken raw materials to imported procurement
1985
Strategic Decision
Changed company name to Nichirei
Removing 'Reizo (Cold Storage)' from the name redefined the company from a warehousing firm to a food company
1985
New entry into pharmaceutical and breeding businesses
1985New entry into pharmaceutical and breeding businesses
1986
Strategic Decision
Full-scale launch of household frozen food marketing
The duality of reaching 100 billion yen in sales and the absence of a reason to 'choose Nichirei'
1988
Strategic Decision
Launched Acerola Drink
The design of a 'New Nichirei' symbolic product that repurposed freezing technology into beverages
1988
Strategic Decision
Redeveloped factory sites
How warehouse sites acquired during wartime control were converted into real estate income sources 40 years later
1989
Strategic Decision
Launched the Logistics Project
How renaming from 'Freezing Plants' to 'Logistics Service Centers' signaled a business redefinition
1994
Strategic Decision
Developed Sakusaku Croquettes
A turning point in frozen food design that removed the cooking premise of 'deep-frying in oil'
2000
Strengthened quality assurance systems
2000Strengthened quality assurance systems
2001
Launched household frozen food 'Honkaku Itame Chahan'
2001Launched household frozen food 'Honkaku Itame Chahan'
2001
Launched household frozen food 'Toku Kara'
2001Launched household frozen food 'Toku Kara'
2005
Transitioned to a holding company structure
2005Transitioned to a holding company structure
2007
Strategic Decision
Operated a directly managed poultry farm in Iwate Prefecture
Upstream integration as a structural risk response to 99% import dependence for grandparent stock
2010
Strategic Decision
Acquired Transports Godfroy
An entry design into European cold chain logistics through acquiring four existing companies for 24 million euros total
2013
Acquired a U.S. food company
2013Acquired a U.S. food company
2014
Strategic Decision
Strengthening of frozen foods
A quality transformation that made taste itself the purchase motivation to escape promotional discounting dependence
2021
Launched the Medium-Term Management Plan (FY2022-24)
2021Launched the Medium-Term Management Plan (FY2022-24)
2023
Established new frozen rice factory (Fukuoka Prefecture)
2023Established new frozen rice factory (Fukuoka Prefecture)
View Performance
RevenueNichirei:Revenue
Non-consol. | Consolidated (Unit: ¥100M)
-
Revenue:2024/3
ProfitNichirei:Net Profit Margin
Non-consol. | Consolidated (Unit: %)
%
Margin:2024/3
View Performance
PeriodTypeRevenueProfit*Margin
1950/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1951/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1952/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1953/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1954/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1955/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥11B¥1B6.7%
1956/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1957/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1958/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥16B--
1959/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥16B--
1960/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥18B--
1961/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥22B--
1962/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1963/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1964/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1965/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1966/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1967/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1968/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1969/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1970/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1971/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1972/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1973/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1974/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1975/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1976/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥161B¥1B0.8%
1977/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥186B¥2B0.9%
1978/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥201B¥2B0.9%
1979/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥205B¥2B0.9%
1980/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥242B¥2B0.9%
1981/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥228B¥2B0.7%
1982/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥233B¥2B0.8%
1983/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥255B¥2B0.8%
1984/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥261B¥2B0.8%
1985/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥276B¥2B0.8%
1986/1Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1987/9Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1988/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1989/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥341B¥4B1.0%
1990/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥365B¥4B1.0%
1991/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥386B¥4B0.9%
1992/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥390B¥4B1.0%
1993/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income¥393B¥4B1.0%
1994/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1995/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1996/3Non-consol. Revenue / Net Income---
1997/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥591B¥2B0.3%
1998/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥594B-¥5B-0.9%
1999/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥572B¥0B0.0%
2000/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥569B¥4B0.7%
2001/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥560B¥4B0.7%
2002/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥558B¥4B0.7%
2003/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥563B¥5B0.9%
2004/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥497B-¥2B-0.4%
2005/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥461B¥6B1.2%
2006/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥469B¥6B1.3%
2007/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥458B¥11B2.3%
2008/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥464B¥10B2.0%
2009/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥475B¥6B1.2%
2010/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥438B¥9B2.0%
2011/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥438B¥4B0.9%
2012/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥455B¥8B1.7%
2013/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥470B¥10B2.0%
2014/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥511B¥9B1.7%
2015/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥520B¥10B1.8%
2016/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥535B¥13B2.5%
2017/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥540B¥19B3.4%
2018/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥568B¥19B3.3%
2019/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥580B¥20B3.4%
2020/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥585B¥20B3.3%
2021/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥573B¥21B3.7%
2022/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥603B¥23B3.8%
2023/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income¥662B¥22B3.2%
2024/3Consolidated Revenue / Net Income---
Disclaimer
Japan Corporate History & Strategy uses Google Analytics, provided by Google LLC, to improve quality. Information held by visitors (IP address, visited URL, referrer URL, visit timestamp, and device information) is transmitted to Google LLC. This website is compiled from publicly available information by an individual developer and represents personal views. We do not guarantee accuracy, completeness, or timeliness. The developer assumes no liability for any damages arising from the use of information on this website.
1942
12

Established Imperial Fisheries Control Co., Ltd.

The unintentional entry barrier of approximately 220 nationwide bases formed by state-directed consolidation

Imperial Fisheries Control was established as a wartime national policy, but as a result of consolidating approximately 220 cold storage and ice-making plants under a single company, a base network that competitors could not easily replicate was formed even after the war. The factory groups dispersed at each port represented a scale that would require significant cost and time for any individual company to build from scratch, structurally supporting Nippon Reizo's monopolistic position. The structure in which consolidation based on the short-term policy objective of wartime control generated long-term competitive advantage in corporate competition is an example of unintentional entry barrier formation.

BackgroundA national policy to consolidate fishery shore operations under a single company based on wartime control orders

In the early 1940s, Japan was under a total war mobilization system, and marine products were positioned as strategic materials supporting protein supply to the nation. Under wartime control orders, the government identified the inefficiency of cold storage, ice-making, and freezing shore operations individually held by fishing companies, and directed their consolidation under a single entity. The aim was to simplify logistics and optimize resource allocation, prioritizing supply reliability over private enterprise competitive principles.

At the time, many of the freezing and ice-making plants originated from small and medium-sized operators based at local ports. Through past industry restructuring, these had come under the umbrella of major fishing companies such Nippon Suisan and Hayashikane Shoten, but as shore operations, they continued to be managed in a dispersed manner. While nominally a consolidation of major capital, in substance it bore the character of an aggregation of small and medium-sized ice-making companies.

At a time when household refrigerators were not yet widespread, ice-making operations were indispensable for fresh fish distribution, and a dispersed base configuration with ice-making and cold storage plants at each port was practically required. Against this backdrop, the concept of consolidating freezing, ice-making, and cold storage shore operations as a national policy took concrete form.

DecisionEstablishment of a state-controlled company through in-kind contributions from major fishing companies, inheriting approximately 220 bases nationwide

In December 1942, Imperial Fisheries Control Co., Ltd. was established under government direction. The contributors were major fishing companies including Nippon Suisan, Nichiro Gyogyo, and Hayashikane Shoten, and the capital of 50 million yen was primarily composed of in-kind contributions of cold storage and ice-making plants held by each company. The company inherited approximately 220 freezing, ice-making, and cold storage plants across the nation, and was positioned as a state-controlled company to centrally manage shore operations.

This consolidation was not an individual company's growth strategy but a decision that prioritized national supply-demand management. The designation of ice-making as the core business also reflected the strong practical demand for supporting fresh fish distribution. The dispersed operations with plants at each port were preserved even under the control system, and the nationwide base network became the new company's business foundation as-is.

From the point of establishment, a company possessing cold storage and ice-making infrastructure on a national scale had been created. In that the business scale was formed through blanket state-directed consolidation rather than inter-company competition, this was an origin fundamentally different from normal corporate growth.

ResultRe-launched as Nippon Reizo after the war, establishing a near-monopoly position in the ice-making sector

With the end of the war in 1945, state-controlled companies were being dismantled in various sectors, but Imperial Fisheries Control chose to continue its business. In December of that year, it changed its name to Nippon Reizo Co., Ltd. and re-launched as a private enterprise centered on cold storage warehousing and seafood processing. The nationally dispersed factory network constructed during wartime had the effect of diversifying regional risk and functioned as a revenue source even in the unstable postwar supply-demand environment.

In 1949, the company listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange and settled capital relationships with major shareholders such as Nippon Suisan. Its positioning was transformed from a subcontractor of specific fishing companies to an independent cold storage and seafood processing company. In January of that year, it also underwent a process of restructuring 1,000 employees to correct the redundancy of the wartime structure.

By the mid-1950s, the company secured the top domestic share in the ice-making sector, establishing a near-monopoly position. The factory network dispersed across approximately 170 locations nationwide provided diversification of regional risk and stability of diversified management, serving as the foundation for consistent earnings each period. The political decision-making of wartime control ultimately remained as a source of competitive advantage over the long term.

The unintentional entry barrier of approximately 220 nationwide bases formed by state-directed consolidation

Imperial Fisheries Control was established as a wartime national policy, but as a result of consolidating approximately 220 cold storage and ice-making plants under a single company, a base network that competitors could not easily replicate was formed even after the war. The factory groups dispersed at each port represented a scale that would require significant cost and time for any individual company to build from scratch, structurally supporting Nippon Reizo's monopolistic position. The structure in which consolidation based on the short-term policy objective of wartime control generated long-term competitive advantage in corporate competition is an example of unintentional entry barrier formation.

TestimonySecurities Times Report (159)

With factories in 170 locations nationwide, and these being dispersed across the nation, regional risk is diversified, which combined with diversified management, brings stability to operations. Furthermore, as our company holds a near-monopoly position in the industry, centered on the ice-making division, we have been posting consistent earnings each period.

TimelineEstablished Imperial Fisheries Control Co., Ltd. — Key Events
12/1942Established Imperial Fisheries Control Co., Ltd.
12/1945Changed company name to Nippon Reizo Co., Ltd.
1/1949Reduced workforce by 1,000 employees
5/1949Listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange
9/1955Achieved domestic top position (monopoly) in ice-making
1945
Changed company name to Nippon Reizo Co., Ltd.
1949
Listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange
1951
8

Entered the processed food business

The exploratory process where dispersed investment across five areas led to concentration on frozen foods

Nichirei expanded into five areas—seafood, frozen foods, processed marine paste products, canned goods, and livestock products—from the 1950s through the 1960s. While many areas faced competition from specialized manufacturers, in frozen foods, the cold chain logistics network inherited from the cold storage warehousing business functioned as an entry barrier. In a situation where which business to concentrate on could not be determined in advance, the exploratory investment across multiple areas retrospectively narrowed down the effective options.

BackgroundA new president who sought transformation from cold storage warehousing to food business, given the limited value-add of the warehouse operation

In the postwar period, Nichirei's business centered on cold storage warehousing and seafood processing, with the company in a subcontractor-like position to fishing companies. While the cold storage and ice-making equipment business generated stable earnings, its sources of value-add were limited, and sales growth faced structural constraints. Around 1950, the Japanese economy was entering its recovery phase, and demand for processed foods was gradually expanding, particularly in urban areas.

Kokojiro Kimura, who assumed the presidency in August 1951, had a background at Nippon Suisan and had transferred to Imperial Fisheries Control during the war. Kimura questioned the very business model of dependence on storage and primary processing, and believed it necessary to transform Nichirei from 'a company that owns facilities' to 'a company that sells food.' This awareness became the starting point for the aspiration to become a comprehensive food manufacturer.

For Nichirei at the time, cold storage warehousing was the foundation of stable earnings, but the ceiling for growth was already visible. Cultivating the food business as a new revenue source required a mindset shift from storage to manufacturing, and the change in management provided that catalyst.

DecisionDecided to expand investment across five areas from seafood to frozen foods, canned goods, and livestock products

Under the Kimura leadership, Nichirei launched a full-scale entry into processed foods beyond just seafood. From the 1950s through the 1960s, the business was expanded across five areas: seafood products, frozen foods, processed marine paste products, canned goods, and livestock products. However, at this stage, 'which food category to focus on' was not clearly defined, and the business portfolio was expanded through trial and error.

The Comprehensive Five-Year Plan initiated in fiscal 1961 backed this direction with capital allocation. Over five years, a cumulative 17 billion yen was invested, with 8 billion yen allocated to the mainstay freezing-related operations and 9 billion yen to the food business, where growth potential was anticipated. While freezing remained the center of revenue composition, the decision was made to tilt capital investment toward food.

The core of capital investment was the reorganization of food factories. Existing food factories were small-scale and dispersed, lacking efficiency by product category. A comprehensive food factory was newly built in Funabashi, Chiba Prefecture, pursuing an integrated production system for ham, sausages, processed foods, and canned goods. The location selection proximate to consumption areas was also a decision conscious of mass production and logistics.

ResultThe fortunes of the five areas diverged, with frozen foods establishing itself as the growth axis

Through the 1960s, the development across the five areas gradually diverged in fortunes. Seafood products and canned goods proved difficult to differentiate, and processed marine paste products and livestock products faced competition from specialized manufacturers. In each area, Nichirei lacked the distinctive advantage needed to succeed as a late entrant.

On the other hand, in frozen foods, the company expanded primarily in the commercial-use market, leveraging its proprietary cold chain logistics network to form entry barriers. The cold temperature management capability inherited from the cold storage warehousing business had high compatibility with frozen food manufacturing and distribution, which translated into competitive advantage.

As a result, while the comprehensive food manufacturer path was maintained, frozen foods became established as the growth axis from the 1970s onward. The dispersed business development was inefficient in the short term, but it functioned as a process of field-testing the competitive environment in each area, providing the basis for subsequent judgment leading to concentration on frozen foods.

The exploratory process where dispersed investment across five areas led to concentration on frozen foods

Nichirei expanded into five areas—seafood, frozen foods, processed marine paste products, canned goods, and livestock products—from the 1950s through the 1960s. While many areas faced competition from specialized manufacturers, in frozen foods, the cold chain logistics network inherited from the cold storage warehousing business functioned as an entry barrier. In a situation where which business to concentrate on could not be determined in advance, the exploratory investment across multiple areas retrospectively narrowed down the effective options.

TimelineEntered the processed food business — Key Events
8/1951Commenced operations at the canned goods factory
10/1952Started sales of prepared frozen foods
1956Entered the livestock products business
2/1961Launched the Comprehensive Five-Year Plan
1956
Entered the livestock products business
1970
12

Continued capital investment

The cost and consequences of an expansion strategy that supplemented investment exceeding profits with borrowings

Nichirei accelerated reinvestment in cold storage warehousing against the backdrop of profit recovery from the food business. Accepting a plan in which capital investment consistently exceeded pre-tax profit and supplementing the shortfall with borrowings produced a doubling of revenue but also resulted in persistently elevated debt ratios. Growth investment in equipment-intensive industries requires upfront capital deployment that precedes profits, but depending on the scale and duration, financial flexibility can be lost. The tension between growth and soundness remained as a management challenge in subsequent years.

BackgroundProfit recovery from the food business expanded reinvestment capacity into the freezing sector

Through the 1960s, Nichirei's processed food business achieved sales growth and reached a level of profitability comparable to the freezing business. In the profit composition, the freezing business accounted for approximately 56% and the food business for approximately 46%, suggesting that the food business had entered a capital recovery phase. As a result, financial room emerged to reconsider investment in the freezing and cold storage sectors, which had been constrained during the food expansion period.

On the other hand, cold storage warehousing and cold chain logistics were equipment-intensive businesses with large initial investments. In the latter half of the 1960s, while revenue expanded, pre-tax profit did not grow at the same rate as sales, and there were constraints on funding growth investment solely from retained earnings. A tension between growth and finances was emerging.

For Nichirei, cold storage warehousing was the foundation of the business, and postponing equipment renewal and expansion would directly lead to declining competitiveness. With the food business's profits now in a recovery phase, the risk of missing the window for reinvestment in the freezing and cold storage sectors was recognized as a management challenge.

DecisionAccepted capital investment consistently exceeding pre-tax profit, funded by borrowings

As of 1970, Nichirei made clear its intention to continue investing in cold storage warehousing and processed foods. What was distinctive was the acceptance of a plan in which capital investment consistently exceeded pre-tax profit. To prevent investment shortfalls from becoming a growth constraint, the shortfall was to be covered by bank borrowings.

From 1965 to 1970, capital investment expanded from 1.4 billion yen to 4.5 billion yen, while borrowing balances also increased from 19.1 billion yen to 23 billion yen. The debt ratio fluctuated from the high 40% range to above 50%, indicating a decision-making approach that prioritized sales growth over capital structure stability. Given the characteristics of freezing and cold storage as equipment-intensive industries, a leveraged expansion strategy was chosen.

This decision was based on the recognition that investment capacity had emerged as the food business's profit recovery progressed. However, a structure in which investment exceeding profit was supplemented by borrowings carried side effects of increasing sensitivity to interest burdens and economic fluctuations.

ResultRevenue doubled in five years but persistently high debt ratios rigidified the financial structure

Under this investment policy, Nichirei's revenue doubled in five years from 36.4 billion yen in fiscal 1965 to 73 billion yen in fiscal 1970. The expansion of cold storage warehouse capacity supported increased handling volumes for frozen foods and seafood processing, contributing to the expansion of the overall business portfolio.

Meanwhile, the debt ratio remained elevated in the 40-50% range, and the financial structure gradually became rigid. The structure in which retained earnings could not keep pace with investment needs continued, and resilience to changes in the earnings environment was declining.

As a result, from the 1970s onward, Nichirei entered a state of simultaneously holding growth potential and financial constraints. Concentrated investment funded by borrowings achieved short-term sales growth but increased sensitivity to interest burdens and economic fluctuations. The decisions made during this period became a precursor that would later compel financial improvement and business selection.

The cost and consequences of an expansion strategy that supplemented investment exceeding profits with borrowings

Nichirei accelerated reinvestment in cold storage warehousing against the backdrop of profit recovery from the food business. Accepting a plan in which capital investment consistently exceeded pre-tax profit and supplementing the shortfall with borrowings produced a doubling of revenue but also resulted in persistently elevated debt ratios. Growth investment in equipment-intensive industries requires upfront capital deployment that precedes profits, but depending on the scale and duration, financial flexibility can be lost. The tension between growth and soundness remained as a management challenge in subsequent years.

1980
3

Seafood division fell into deficit

The structural shift from 'volume to profitability' forced by the founding business's deficit

The seafood division's fall into deficit demonstrated that a model dependent on purchasing without fishing rights was vulnerable to the external environmental change of the 200-nautical-mile regulation. For Nichirei, seafood processing had been a business since the company's founding, but the rationale for continuing to allocate management resources to an area that was structurally unable to stabilize earnings was diminishing. Triggered by this deficit, the reallocation of the business portfolio accelerated, marking a turning point in the concentration of resources on frozen foods and logistics.

BackgroundStructural deterioration of the seafood business due to the 200-nautical-mile regulation and raw material price surges

From the late 1970s through the early 1980s, Japan's fishing industry was severely constrained by the introduction of the 200-nautical-mile exclusive economic zone, which significantly limited deep-sea fishing operations. Raw material fish procurement costs rose, and market volatility intensified, making the traditional model of mass catch and mass distribution increasingly untenable. Nichirei's seafood division did not hold fishing rights and operated on a purchase-centered business model, leaving it structurally exposed to raw material price fluctuations.

The combination of rising import dependence and exchange rate volatility generated cost increases that could not be absorbed by processing and selling margins. The seafood division fell into deficit around 1980, and the limits of a business model premised on handling volume expansion became evident. While seafood processing had been a business since the company's founding, structural changes in the external environment had made maintaining profitability difficult.

DecisionPolicy shift from volume expansion to profitability focus, and restructuring of unprofitable product lines

In response to the deficit, Nichirei undertook fundamental structural reform of its seafood business. The model premised on handling volume expansion was reconsidered, and a policy of restructuring unprofitable transactions and product lines was articulated. For raw materials with high price volatility and processing areas with low profitability, downsizing and withdrawal were considered, while remaining businesses were steered toward higher value-add and use case redesign.

This policy shift repositioned the seafood division from a volume business to a selective business. Decisions were made to allocate management resources toward the higher-growth frozen food and logistics sectors, and the weight of the seafood business within Nichirei's business portfolio was progressively reduced. The core of the structural reform was the refusal to treat the founding business as a sacred cow, instead reviewing resource allocation based on profitability.

The structural shift from 'volume to profitability' forced by the founding business's deficit

The seafood division's fall into deficit demonstrated that a model dependent on purchasing without fishing rights was vulnerable to the external environmental change of the 200-nautical-mile regulation. For Nichirei, seafood processing had been a business since the company's founding, but the rationale for continuing to allocate management resources to an area that was structurally unable to stabilize earnings was diminishing. Triggered by this deficit, the reallocation of the business portfolio accelerated, marking a turning point in the concentration of resources on frozen foods and logistics.

1981
Switched fried chicken raw materials to imported procurement
1985
2

Changed company name to Nichirei

Removing 'Reizo (Cold Storage)' from the name redefined the company from a warehousing firm to a food company

The change from 'Nippon Reizo' to 'Nichirei' was a response to the company name evoking cold storage warehousing constraining the expansion of the food business. The name change was not a mere abbreviation but a decision to externally signal the fact that the business center had shifted from cold storage warehousing to frozen foods. The coordination with internal campaigns was based on the recognition that a name change alone does not change organizational mindset, representing a case where branding initiatives and organizational reform were advanced in tandem.

BackgroundThe company name had not kept pace with changes in business composition, making corporate image renewal a priority

By the first half of the 1980s, Nichirei's food business centered on frozen foods had expanded, representing a significant departure from the previous business composition centered on cold storage warehousing. Meanwhile, the company name 'Nippon Reizo' strongly evoked cold storage warehousing, and the gap with the actual business was becoming evident. In the consumer market, brand and corporate image were entering a phase where they influenced purchasing behavior, and a corporate image heavily oriented toward commercial and B2B operations had limitations for expanding household frozen food sales.

Internally as well, an awareness was emerging that changes in organizational culture and mindset were not keeping pace with business expansion. Establishing recognition as a food manufacturer required a fundamental renewal of the corporate image, including a name change.

DecisionChanged the company name from 'Nippon Reizo' to 'Nichirei' and redefined the company through CI renewal

In 1985, Nippon Reizo changed its name to 'Nichirei Corporation.' The aim was to sever the association with being a cold storage warehousing company and rebuild recognition as a comprehensive food enterprise. Simultaneously, the CI was renewed and a unified design centered on the 'N' mark was introduced. The intention was to signal the company's change of direction both internally and externally through visual consistency.

This name change went beyond an external branding initiative. Internally, company-wide campaigns such as 'Tomorrow's Nichirei' and the 'FN Movement' were launched, building up shop-floor-led improvement activities through quality management and workplace enhancement. A process was adopted to substantiate the name change in practice, with the mindset shift from a warehousing company to a food company promoted across the entire organization.

Removing 'Reizo (Cold Storage)' from the name redefined the company from a warehousing firm to a food company

The change from 'Nippon Reizo' to 'Nichirei' was a response to the company name evoking cold storage warehousing constraining the expansion of the food business. The name change was not a mere abbreviation but a decision to externally signal the fact that the business center had shifted from cold storage warehousing to frozen foods. The coordination with internal campaigns was based on the recognition that a name change alone does not change organizational mindset, representing a case where branding initiatives and organizational reform were advanced in tandem.

1985
New entry into pharmaceutical and breeding businesses
1986

Full-scale launch of household frozen food marketing

The duality of reaching 100 billion yen in sales and the absence of a reason to 'choose Nichirei'

Investment in household frozen foods achieved sales at the 100 billion yen scale, but the structure of promotional discounting dependence and price competition was not resolved. Because frozen foods have high shelf life, they are easily subject to price reduction as a means of inventory adjustment, and even with hit products, securing medium-to-long-term profitability was difficult. As the then-president reflected that 'we were lacking in efforts to communicate what kind of company we are,' this case demonstrated that quantitative growth and brand value construction are separate challenges.

BackgroundThe household frozen food market was growing but inherently contained challenges of price competition and differentiation

By the mid-1980s, the increase in dual-income and single-person households was driving simplification of home cooking, and frozen foods were recognized as having room for household market expansion. Frozen foods had high suitability in terms of shelf life and cooking time reduction, but the impression of being an extension of commercial-use products was strong, and use cases and consumption occasions for household use had not been sufficiently organized.

At Nichirei as well, frozen foods were expected as a growth area, but challenges remained in terms of profit margins and differentiation. Due to the nature of frozen products, their high shelf life made it difficult to increase turnover rates, and at retail sites, they were easily targeted for promotional discounting. The structure inherent in frozen foods meant that as unit prices fell and competitive entry increased, price competition intensified.

The difficulty of simultaneously achieving volume expansion and profitability was recognized, but having rebuilt recognition as a food company through the 1985 name change, establishing a presence in household frozen foods was a management imperative.

DecisionFull-scale investment in product design aligned with lifestyle scenes and awareness building through television advertising

Triggered by the 1985 name change, Nichirei launched a full-scale marketing effort for household frozen foods. Redefining frozen foods as 'everyday food available anytime,' product designs aligned with consumers' daily time schedules were advanced. In 1985, the '24hr.' series was introduced, presenting frozen food use cases by explicitly indicating time periods and consumption occasions.

In 1986, household frozen foods for bento (lunch boxes) were launched, and in 1989, 'Harajuku Dog,' which had a track record in commercial use, was adapted for household sale with television advertising. The strategy combined product development and advertising to embed frozen foods in household dining. In 1994, microwave-only croquettes were introduced, with product designs that addressed the cooking behavior itself.

These measures were investments to reposition frozen foods from 'an extension of commercial use' to 'everyday household food,' characterized by the integrated deployment of product development, advertising, and channel strategy.

ResultFrozen food sales reached the 100 billion yen scale, but insufficient differentiation remained as a challenge

Through these measures, Nichirei produced multiple hit products in frozen foods, and the production system was also expanded. The results of factory consolidation and capital investment pursued since the 1970s materialized, and by the early 1990s, frozen food sales reached the 100 billion yen scale. The presence in the household market had clearly increased.

However, competitors were also focusing on frozen foods, and price competition intensified further. Due to the high shelf life of frozen products, inventory adjustments were easy, and promotional discounting became routine. While share grew, profitability struggled to improve, and the difficulty of differentiation became apparent.

In later years, then-President Teshima reflected that 'compared to the improvement in name recognition, we were lacking in efforts to communicate what kind of company we are.' The concentrated investment in household frozen foods brought sales growth, but the construction of 'buying because it's Nichirei' as a purchase motivation was not sufficiently achieved.

The duality of reaching 100 billion yen in sales and the absence of a reason to 'choose Nichirei'

Investment in household frozen foods achieved sales at the 100 billion yen scale, but the structure of promotional discounting dependence and price competition was not resolved. Because frozen foods have high shelf life, they are easily subject to price reduction as a means of inventory adjustment, and even with hit products, securing medium-to-long-term profitability was difficult. As the then-president reflected that 'we were lacking in efforts to communicate what kind of company we are,' this case demonstrated that quantitative growth and brand value construction are separate challenges.

TestimonyTadashi Teshima (President of Nichirei at the time)

The 1985 name change boosted our recognition, and we may have been complacent about that, neglecting the effort to communicate what kind of company Nichirei is. Even though we say we're No. 1 in frozen food market share, new entrants keep coming, and price competition only intensifies. To get consumers to buy our products in that environment, we need some other form of added value. If we increase product advertising, sales of that particular product may grow in the short term, but it won't last.

Source1997-01-20 Nikkei Business
TimelineFull-scale launch of household frozen food marketing — Key Events
1985Launched the '24hr.' and 'JET MENU' series
1986Launched household frozen foods for bento
1989Adapted Harajuku Dog for household market. Aired TV commercials
1994Developed microwave-only croquettes
1988
4

Launched Acerola Drink

The design of a 'New Nichirei' symbolic product that repurposed freezing technology into beverages

Acerola Drink was a product that repurposed the existing capability of freezing and cold chain management technology into the new domain of beverages. The ability to stably process and preserve acerola, which deteriorates rapidly in freshness, was Nichirei's technological advantage, and the rarity and functional value of the ingredient formed the basis for differentiation. The rapid growth from fiscal 1988 sales of 18 million yen to 8 billion yen in 1990 was an effect of mass advertising investment, while also functioning as a means of delivering recognition as a food company to consumers.

BackgroundEven after the name change, no consumer-facing product existed to symbolize the 'new Nichirei'

In the first half of the 1980s, Nichirei had positioned itself as 'New Nichirei' through the name change and CI renewal, but no product existed that could intuitively convey this change to consumers. While frozen foods and logistics had large business scales, they were difficult for consumers to associate with the company name, and the results of the corporate image renewal were not reaching consumers.

In 1982, the development department was separated from the business department, establishing a framework for new business exploration. Themes were sought that met conditions including room for technological accumulation, rarity of core materials, and business expandability. Among multiple proposals examined, the fruit 'acerola,' which has an extremely high vitamin C content, attracted attention. The rising health consciousness and the material's characteristic of highlighting food functionality were valued.

DecisionEntry into acerola beverages leveraging compatibility with freezing technology, accompanied by mass advertising investment

In 1988, Nichirei launched 'Acerola Drink' made from acerola. Acerola is a material that deteriorates rapidly in freshness and is difficult to process and preserve, and the compatibility with the freezing and cold chain management technologies the company had cultivated was the decisive factor. Raw materials were primarily sourced from Brazil, and with an eye toward potential supply concerns, cultivation and processing systems were also being established locally.

At launch, the product was primarily offered in 135g cans, and fiscal 1988 sales amounted to only approximately 18 million yen. In 1989, the company switched to 190g cans and made a full-scale entry into the beverage market. Sales channels were also expanded to kiosks and convenience stores, and through mass advertising investment and television commercials, brand awareness was rapidly elevated, with sales reaching approximately 8 billion yen in 1990.

ResultEstablished recognition as the symbolic product of 'New Nichirei' and formed a foothold in the beverage business

Acerola Drink became a product that delivered the Nichirei name directly to consumers in a domain distinct from frozen foods and logistics. Combining the functional value of abundant vitamin C with the topicality of a rare ingredient, it was positioned as a product symbolizing New Nichirei.

On the other hand, the beverage market was also an area with low barriers to competitive entry, easily exposed to competition from major beverage manufacturers. While the distinctiveness of acerola as an ingredient served as a differentiating factor, whether the beverage business as a whole would grow into an earnings pillar for Nichirei depended on subsequent business development.

The design of a 'New Nichirei' symbolic product that repurposed freezing technology into beverages

Acerola Drink was a product that repurposed the existing capability of freezing and cold chain management technology into the new domain of beverages. The ability to stably process and preserve acerola, which deteriorates rapidly in freshness, was Nichirei's technological advantage, and the rarity and functional value of the ingredient formed the basis for differentiation. The rapid growth from fiscal 1988 sales of 18 million yen to 8 billion yen in 1990 was an effect of mass advertising investment, while also functioning as a means of delivering recognition as a food company to consumers.

1988
12

Redeveloped factory sites

How warehouse sites acquired during wartime control were converted into real estate income sources 40 years later

Nichirei's urban center warehouse sites were assets inherited at the time of Imperial Fisheries Control's establishment in 1942. The decision to convert the use of land that had completed its purpose as cold storage warehouses while retaining ownership rather than selling was one that utilized the time value of assets. The asymmetry that equipment which depreciated under warehouse use benefited from land price appreciation under real estate use was captured, incorporating a recovery mechanism distinct from business cash flow.

BackgroundUrban center bases that had lost their rationale for continued use as cold storage due to advancing urbanization

Nichirei had inherited cold storage warehouses and factory sites across the nation through the wartime control process at its founding in 1942. Even into the 1980s, the company still held numerous small-scale real estate properties including those in urban centers, but as surrounding areas urbanized, constraints in terms of logistics routes and expansion space had become evident. In central Tokyo in particular, the advance of residential and commercial development had brought the continued use of sites as cold storage warehouses into a phase where it lacked economic rationale.

Meanwhile, land prices were rising, particularly in the waterfront areas, and land that had been held on the books for warehouse use had come to hold potentially high real estate value. With the heavy equipment renewal burden of the cold storage warehousing business, the question of how to handle these increasingly underutilized properties emerged as a subject of management decision-making.

DecisionChose to redevelop urban center warehouse sites into office buildings while retaining ownership rather than selling

In December 1988, Nichirei decided to redevelop the former Akashicho factory site in Chuo-ku, Tokyo as an office building. Rather than selling the land that had completed its use as a cold storage warehouse, the company chose to continue holding it and earn rental income. Total construction costs were approximately 6.5 billion yen, with stable revenue expected from bulk leasing from the first year after completion.

This policy was not limited to the former Akashicho factory. In 1990, the former Kachidoki Bridge factory site was also approved for office redevelopment. The four target properties—the former Akashicho factory (approximately 4,200 sq.m), Kachidoki Bridge factory (approximately 4,600 sq.m), Tokyo factory (approximately 6,100 sq.m), and Minato Building (approximately 650 sq.m)—were all located in the Tokyo waterfront area. The decision was to incorporate real estate leasing as a revenue source complementing the cold storage warehousing business.

ResultBuilt a system to recover cash from warehouse assets on a different time horizon from business growth

The office redevelopment of warehouse sites secured a revenue source for Nichirei distinct from its food and logistics businesses. Rather than one-time monetization through sale, the choice to continue holding properties and earn rental income was a strategy to recover asset value on a different time horizon from the business.

The structure in which dispersed locations acquired during the wartime control period came to hold value as urban center real estate assets more than 40 years later is instructive from the perspective of use conversion of equipment assets. Bases that had completed their role as cold storage warehouses came to serve the role of complementing Nichirei's financial base in the form of real estate income.

How warehouse sites acquired during wartime control were converted into real estate income sources 40 years later

Nichirei's urban center warehouse sites were assets inherited at the time of Imperial Fisheries Control's establishment in 1942. The decision to convert the use of land that had completed its purpose as cold storage warehouses while retaining ownership rather than selling was one that utilized the time value of assets. The asymmetry that equipment which depreciated under warehouse use benefited from land price appreciation under real estate use was captured, incorporating a recovery mechanism distinct from business cash flow.

TimelineRedeveloped factory sites — Key Events
12/1988Redeveloped former Akashicho factory site as office space
1990Redeveloped former Kachidoki Bridge factory site as office space
1989

Launched the Logistics Project

How renaming from 'Freezing Plants' to 'Logistics Service Centers' signaled a business redefinition

Nichirei renamed its logistics bases from 'freezing plants' to 'Logistics Service Centers.' This change was an act signaling the transformation from a storage business to a logistics services business both internally and externally, accompanied by the decision to switch the evaluation axis from storage area to processing capacity. The significance lies in recognizing the structural limitation that an extension of warehousing could not meet the retail side's needs for multi-item small-lot and short-lead-time fulfillment, and rewriting the very definition of the business.

BackgroundThe storage-centered cold storage model reached its limits as frozen food distribution volumes expanded

In the late 1980s, Nichirei's logistics business was reaching a turning point. Conventional cold storage warehouses were centered on storage-type operations that held large container-unit quantities for a fixed period before dispatch. However, with the expansion of frozen food distribution volumes and the increase in imported foods, the frequency of receiving and dispatching had risen, and storage-centered operations could no longer keep pace.

Changes in retail formats also had an impact. Supermarkets demanded multi-item small-lot, short-lead-time fulfillment, requiring logistics functions that encompassed sorting, trans-loading, and delivery beyond mere storage. Cold storage warehouses had entered a phase where processing capacity and turnover rate, not physical storage volume, were what mattered.

Against these demand changes, the extension of the warehousing business was showing its limits. The conventional mindset of measuring cold storage value by storage area was creating a structural gap with the service levels demanded by the retail side.

DecisionLaunched the Logistics Project and initiated the redefinition from 'storage' to 'processing and movement'

In 1989, Nichirei launched the 'Logistics Project' and began redefining cold chain logistics. The project was organized across the freezing business's affiliated companies, development departments, and trading departments, and two directions were presented as the new logistics vision. One was a customer-intimacy type that designed logistics according to each customer's requirements.

The other was the concept of 'systems logistics' that centered on movement and processing rather than storage. The idea emphasized transfer over storage, providing sorting, customs clearance, light processing, and delivery as an integrated service. This was a decision to reconceptualize logistics not as a cost but as a function that generates added value.

This redefinition involved departing from the equipment-dependent thinking inherent in the cold storage warehousing business, to reconfigure functions in line with demand-side changes. It was a decision to switch the evaluation axis from storage area to processing capacity, from volume to turnover rate.

ResultRenamed to 'Logistics Service Centers' and established a joint delivery system

In 1990, Nichirei renamed the bases it had been calling 'freezing plants' to 'Logistics Service Centers.' This was a symbolic name change signaling the transformation from storage bases to service delivery bases, both internally and externally. Simultaneously, the organization of Nippon Low Temperature Distribution was restructured, establishing a nationwide delivery system.

At the Logistics Service Centers, operations were introduced based on L-shaped platform berth consolidation and temporary truck staging. Combined with information management through online systems, inventory status and shipping instructions were made visible, enabling response to joint delivery and high-frequency small-lot delivery.

This led to the expansion of transactions with major retailers, and the cold storage warehousing business changed its character to a logistics services business. The renaming of bases was not merely a matter of nomenclature but an act of rewriting the very definition of the business.

How renaming from 'Freezing Plants' to 'Logistics Service Centers' signaled a business redefinition

Nichirei renamed its logistics bases from 'freezing plants' to 'Logistics Service Centers.' This change was an act signaling the transformation from a storage business to a logistics services business both internally and externally, accompanied by the decision to switch the evaluation axis from storage area to processing capacity. The significance lies in recognizing the structural limitation that an extension of warehousing could not meet the retail side's needs for multi-item small-lot and short-lead-time fulfillment, and rewriting the very definition of the business.

TimelineLaunched the Logistics Project — Key Events
nullSapporo West
Storage capacity1.6ten thousand tons
nullIruma (Saitama)
Storage capacity2.2ten thousand tons
nullFunabashi No. 2 (Chiba)
Storage capacity4.7ten thousand tons
nullOsaka Daini Shinnan
Storage capacity2.2ten thousand tons
nullTosu (Saga)
Storage capacity2ten thousand tons
1994

Developed Sakusaku Croquettes

A turning point in frozen food design that removed the cooking premise of 'deep-frying in oil'

Sakusaku Croquettes were a product that took the cooking behavior itself, rather than flavor or ingredient improvements, as the starting point of design. By removing the implicit constraint of 'deep-frying' from frozen croquettes, based on the premise of microwave oven prevalence, the product eliminated the very factor constraining purchase frequency. The multi-layered breading and moisture control were technical solutions as means; the essence was in redefining the product from the starting point of 'who cooks how.'

BackgroundFrozen croquettes were popular products, but 'the hassle of deep-frying' constrained purchase frequency

In the early 1990s, the frozen food market was expanding, but the cooking burden at home was constraining wider adoption. While frozen croquettes were popular products, the common sentiment among homemakers that 'deep-frying is troublesome because of the oil disposal' meant that purchase frequency was stagnating. Microwave ovens were spreading rapidly, but due to moisture migration characteristics, breaded coatings tended to become soggy, and microwave ovens were considered unsuitable for reproducing the texture of fried foods.

Frozen croquettes remained in the market carrying the implicit premise of being 'a product meant to be deep-fried.' Overcoming the wall between deliciousness and convenience required a product design that fundamentally reconsidered the cooking method itself.

DecisionDeveloped 'Sakusaku Croquettes' designed exclusively for microwave preparation, transforming the cooking premise

In 1994, Nichirei launched 'Sakusaku Croquettes (Mini),' designed exclusively for microwave cooking. The development starting point was an analysis of frozen croquette purchasing patterns and surveys of homemakers, with the goal set as 'reproducing the taste of freshly fried food without using oil.' Approximately 15 young employees participated in the development, with repeated investigations focused on breading structure and moisture control.

The greatest challenge was maintaining the crispy texture with microwave ovens' unique heating method. To address the problem of moisture migrating from the filling to the breading, technical innovations were introduced including multi-layered breading, formulation adjustments, and control of moisture behavior during heating. A product was realized that overturned the previous premise of 'not crispy unless deep-fried,' and it was launched as part of the 'New Microwave Life' series.

ResultProduct design originating from cooking behavior demonstrated the expansion of frozen food use cases

Sakusaku Croquettes were a product designed not from flavor improvement but from the cooking behavior itself as the starting point. Based on the premise of microwave oven prevalence as a change in the living environment, the product opened new use cases by removing the constraint that frozen foods were 'something to be deep-fried.'

This product demonstrated that competition in frozen foods extends beyond flavor and price to encompass the design of cooking methods and use occasions. The approach of directly reducing consumers' cooking burden served as a precursor to Nichirei's subsequent 'authentic quality' direction, broadening the perspective of product development.

A turning point in frozen food design that removed the cooking premise of 'deep-frying in oil'

Sakusaku Croquettes were a product that took the cooking behavior itself, rather than flavor or ingredient improvements, as the starting point of design. By removing the implicit constraint of 'deep-frying' from frozen croquettes, based on the premise of microwave oven prevalence, the product eliminated the very factor constraining purchase frequency. The multi-layered breading and moisture control were technical solutions as means; the essence was in redefining the product from the starting point of 'who cooks how.'

2000
Strengthened quality assurance systems
2001
Launched household frozen food 'Honkaku Itame Chahan'
2001
Launched household frozen food 'Toku Kara'
2005
Transitioned to a holding company structure
2007

Operated a directly managed poultry farm in Iwate Prefecture

Upstream integration as a structural risk response to 99% import dependence for grandparent stock

Japan's poultry industry was dependent on overseas imports for 99% of its grandparent stock, and the import suspension due to avian influenza had made the risk of supply disruption a reality. Nichirei Fresh's decision to enter directly managed poultry farming was a response to structural risk that could not be addressed by diversifying procurement sources, employing upstream integration as the means. While raw material internalization typically incurs higher costs, the design was adopted of justifying the investment by converting supply stability and traceability into brand value.

BackgroundStructural risk of the poultry industry dependent on overseas imports for 99% of grandparent stock

By the mid-2000s, Japan's poultry industry harbored a critical structural risk. Approximately 99% of the grandparent stock and parent stock supporting broiler production was dependent on overseas imports, with an extremely high concentration on specific countries and regions. When the Japanese government imposed import suspension measures following avian influenza outbreaks around 2006, the supply of grandparent stock was significantly reduced. The supply disruption was recognized as not a one-time event but one with a high probability of recurrence.

For Nichirei Fresh as well, chicken was an important raw material, and procurement instability directly threatened business continuity. Mere diversification of procurement sources could not avoid infectious disease risk or policy risk, and the conviction strengthened that involvement from the raw material stage was necessary to simultaneously ensure safety and stable supply.

DecisionEstablished a directly managed poultry farm in Iwate Prefecture and built a breeding system for the pure domestic breed 'Junwakei'

In May 2007, Nichirei Fresh established 'Nichirei Fresh Farm' as a joint venture with Ishii, and constructed the Hirono Farm in Hirono-cho, Kunohe-gun, Iwate Prefecture. Grandparent stock bred and improved at the National Livestock Breeding Center's Hyogo Ranch was introduced and raised and marketed as the pure domestic breed 'Junwakei.' The company stepped into directly managed poultry farming, managing the entire process from grandparent stock through hatching and rearing.

This initiative extended beyond procurement internalization to aim at ensuring full-process traceability. The strategy was to make production history visible and promote safety and quality as brand value. In 2012, 'Fresh Chicken Karumai' was established to handle processing, further processing, and sales, building a system that completed the chain from production through processing within the corporate group.

ResultEstablished a shipment system of approximately 1.5 million birds annually and an upstream-integrated chicken procurement model

With the commencement of directly managed poultry farming, Nichirei Fresh established a pure domestic chicken production system capable of approximately 1.5 to 1.6 million birds in annual shipments. The procurement model that did not depend on imported grandparent stock from overseas functioned as a structural countermeasure against supply disruption risks from avian influenza and similar events.

The decision by a food manufacturer to go upstream to the raw material level and directly manage operations was a choice to internalize not just procurement cost optimization but supply stability and quality traceability as management resources.

Upstream integration as a structural risk response to 99% import dependence for grandparent stock

Japan's poultry industry was dependent on overseas imports for 99% of its grandparent stock, and the import suspension due to avian influenza had made the risk of supply disruption a reality. Nichirei Fresh's decision to enter directly managed poultry farming was a response to structural risk that could not be addressed by diversifying procurement sources, employing upstream integration as the means. While raw material internalization typically incurs higher costs, the design was adopted of justifying the investment by converting supply stability and traceability into brand value.

2010
7

Acquired Transports Godfroy

An entry design into European cold chain logistics through acquiring four existing companies for 24 million euros total

The approach Nichirei chose for its French market entry was not building bases from scratch but acquiring existing transportation and warehouse companies as a package. Rather than securing storage and transportation separately, the incorporation of four companies as an integrated unit acquired the functions necessary for cold chain logistics as a package. The investment of approximately 24 million euros total was a design that limited entry risk while securing a foothold for deploying the integrated model established domestically to overseas markets in a short timeframe.

BackgroundMaturation of the domestic cold chain logistics model and exploration of growth opportunities in the European market

By the late 2000s, Nichirei had been advancing the sophistication of its cold chain logistics business domestically. Through scrap-and-build of large cold storage warehouses, conversion to logistics service centers, and expansion of joint delivery, a cold chain logistics model integrating storage and transportation was being established. Domestically, the base network had been developed primarily in major metropolitan areas, and growth potential was gradually becoming limited.

Meanwhile, in Europe, the distribution volumes of frozen foods, meat products, and seafood were large, and demand for cross-border cold chain logistics was structurally high. While Nichirei had already been conducting European operations with the Netherlands as its base, France was an important market on both the production and consumption fronts but lacked a direct business foundation.

DecisionAcquired four French cold chain logistics companies at once to build an integrated storage and transportation system

In July 2010, Nichirei Holding Holland B.V., a European subsidiary of the Nichirei Logistics Group, acquired four French cold chain logistics companies. The core was Transports Godfroy S.A.S., which had a delivery network covering all of France, and by combining it with three cold storage warehouse companies, a system capable of providing integrated storage and transportation was constructed.

The acquisition amount was 15 million euros for share acquisition and approximately 24 million euros total including real estate acquisition. The target companies were all based in northern France, with locations linking major ports such as Le Havre with inland areas. Rather than building bases from scratch, the choice was made to incorporate existing transportation and warehousing functions as an integrated package, establishing a cold chain logistics network in a short timeframe.

ResultEstablished a cold chain logistics deployment base from France into western Europe

The acquisition of four companies enabled Nichirei to establish a business foundation with a view not only to the French domestic market but also to cold chain logistics deployment across western Europe. It was an attempt to apply the integrated storage and transportation operations know-how refined domestically to the different market environment of Europe.

The investment scale of approximately 24 million euros total was restrained even compared to the construction cost of a single large domestic cold storage warehouse, representing a decision to build a foothold for overseas deployment while limiting risk through the acquisition of existing operators.

An entry design into European cold chain logistics through acquiring four existing companies for 24 million euros total

The approach Nichirei chose for its French market entry was not building bases from scratch but acquiring existing transportation and warehouse companies as a package. Rather than securing storage and transportation separately, the incorporation of four companies as an integrated unit acquired the functions necessary for cold chain logistics as a package. The investment of approximately 24 million euros total was a design that limited entry risk while securing a foothold for deploying the integrated model established domestically to overseas markets in a short timeframe.

2013
Acquired a U.S. food company
2014
4

Strengthening of frozen foods

A quality transformation that made taste itself the purchase motivation to escape promotional discounting dependence

Nichirei's 'authentic quality' direction was an attempt to shift the competitive axis in frozen foods from price to taste standards. For frozen foods that are easily subject to promotional discounting due to their high shelf life, transforming the reason for repeat purchase from price to quality required providing cooking standards in frozen food format that cannot be reproduced at home. Building on the outcomes and challenges of quantitative growth accumulated since the 1980s, this was a decision to redefine 'what kind of company we are' through product quality.

BackgroundFrozen food profitability stagnating amid price competition and promotional discounting dependence

By the late 2000s, Nichirei's frozen food business had established a certain position in terms of market size and production volume, but profitability growth was limited due to price competition and promotional discounting dependence. Frozen foods had high shelf life, which made turnover rates slow, and at retail sites, they were structurally prone to being targeted for discount adjustments. Even when hit products were introduced, securing medium-to-long-term profitability remained challenging.

Meanwhile, on the consumer side, the increase in dual-income households and diversification of lifestyles were driving growing demand for 'convenient food without compromising quality.' Nichirei's research clearly showed that products with insufficient taste satisfaction were less likely to generate repeat purchases. The need to redefine value around quality rather than pursuing volume expansion was emerging.

DecisionPolicy shift to production system reorganization and product development foregrounding 'authentic quality'

In 2014, Nichirei simultaneously advanced the reorganization of its production system and quality-oriented product development to rebuild the competitiveness of household frozen foods. While progressing mechanization and labor-saving on frozen food factory lines through new construction and reorganization, the company made clear its policy of foregrounding 'authentic quality' through enhanced commitment to cooking processes.

The emblematic product was 'Honkaku Yaki Onigiri.' Product design emphasized enhancing the handmade feel and reproducibility of the grilling process, providing flavors and aromas that are difficult to recreate at home in frozen food format. Furthermore, in fried rice, proprietary processes combining coating technology and high-temperature short-duration cooking were introduced, and the product was relaunched as 'Honkaku Itame Chahan.' These were product lines that placed taste itself, not convenience, at the center of value.

ResultEstablishment of the 'authentic quality' direction shifted the frozen food value axis from price to quality

The product lines foregrounding authentic quality aimed to provide consumers with purchase motivations independent of promotional discounting. To form the brand preference of 'I buy it because it's Nichirei frozen food,' product designs where the taste standard itself served as the criterion for repeat purchase were necessary.

This policy shift signified the transition from the volume expansion direction pursued since the 1980s to a quality-oriented axis. The approach responded to the challenge identified by then-President Teshima—'the lack of effort to communicate what kind of company we are'—by answering through the quality of the products themselves.

A quality transformation that made taste itself the purchase motivation to escape promotional discounting dependence

Nichirei's 'authentic quality' direction was an attempt to shift the competitive axis in frozen foods from price to taste standards. For frozen foods that are easily subject to promotional discounting due to their high shelf life, transforming the reason for repeat purchase from price to quality required providing cooking standards in frozen food format that cannot be reproduced at home. Building on the outcomes and challenges of quantitative growth accumulated since the 1980s, this was a decision to redefine 'what kind of company we are' through product quality.

2021
Launched the Medium-Term Management Plan (FY2022-24)
2023
Established new frozen rice factory (Fukuoka Prefecture)
Back to Home